Author:
Umar Saeed ,Ahamad Mujahid,Vivek Ranjan ,Syed Ainul Hussain ,Ruchi Badola
Abstract
This study was conducted between June 2017 and December 2018 to assess the bird community structure, diversity, feeding guilds, and the residential status of birds in Gautam Buddha Wildlife Sanctuary (GBWS). Avian diversity and guild organization in five different habitat types were classified according to the forest type present in the landscape. The results indicated a total of 99 avifauna that belongs to 48 families, distributed in 16 orders. Among the 99 species, 77 were residents, 17 were winter visitors, four were summer visitors, and only one was a passage migrant. Based on the feeding guild evaluation, the majority were insectivorous (47%), followed by omnivorous (24%), carnivorous (14%), granivorous (8%), frugivorous (4%), insectivorous (1%), and piscivorous (1%). The scrubland, among other forest types, represented the highest diversity value for the Shannon-Weiner diversity index (3.2), evenness was recorded highest in riverine habitat (0.63), whereas utmost Simpson’s dominance (0.98) and Fisher’s index value (41) were in human settlement. These findings of our study illustrate the outstanding potential of GBWS as an important protected site for mixed bird diversity and specific feeding guilds, precisely in terms of the insectivorous and omnivorous communities. Hence, the study outcomes set a notable landmark for understanding birds and their habitats.
Publisher
Wildlife Information Liaison Development Society
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference86 articles.
1. Adhikari, J.N., B.P. Bhattarai & T.B. Thapa (2019). Factors affecting diversity and distribution of threatened birds in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Journal of Threatened Taxa 11(5): 13511–13522. https://doi.org/10.11609/jot.4137.11.5.13511-13522
2. Andrade, R., H.L. Bateman, J. Franklin & D. Allen (2018). Waterbird community composition, abundance, and diversity along an urban gradient. Landscape and Urban Planning 170: 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.003
3. Aronson, M.F., F.A. la Sorte, C.H. Nilon, M. Katti, M.A. Goddard, C.A. Lepczyk, P.S. Warren, N.S. Williams, S. Cilliers, B. Clarkson, C. Dobbs, R. Dolan, M. Hedblom, S. Klotz, J.L. Kooijmans, I. Kühn, I. Macgregor-Fors, M. McDonnell, U. Mörtberg, P. Petr, S. Stefan, S. Jessica, W. Peter & W. Marten (2014). A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1780): 2013-3330. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3330
4. Azman, N.M., N.S.A. Latip, S.A.M. Sah, M.A.M.M Akil, N.J. Shafie & N.L. Khairuddin (2011). Avian diversity and feeding guilds in a secondary forest, an oil palm plantation and a paddy field in Riparian areas of the Kerian River Basin, Perak, Malaysia. Tropical Life Sciences Research 22(2): 45.
5. Balestrieri, R., M. Basile, M. Posillico, T. Altea, B. De Cinti & G. Matteucci (2015). A guild-based approach to assessing the influence of beech forest structure on bird communities. Forest Ecology and Management 356: 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.07.011