Abstract
Despite being one of the most conflict-prone species in India, the Nilgai antelope Boselaphus tragocamelus has received little scientific attention. In this study, we address this knowledge gap by conducting an analysis of secondary data extracted from print media reports on Human-Nilgai negative interactions at the regional scale (tehsils and districts) across different states of India. Our findings revealed notable variations in conflict levels among different states, with Bihar emerging as the most affected (86 tehsils and 22 districts), followed by Madhya Pradesh (34 tehsils; 21 districts) and Uttar Pradesh (33 tehsils; 20 districts). Within Bihar, Muzaffarpur and East Champaran districts stand out for their high conflict levels. Crop raiding by different populations of Nilgai is identified as the primary cause of the negative interaction, with a relative frequency of occurrence of 98%. Attacks on humans by nilgai, although rare, accounted for a relative frequency of occurrence of only 1.2%. Additionally, newspapers reported retaliatory killings, with a relative frequency of occurrence of 0.84%. Between 2018 and 2022, nilgai populations were documented raiding 45 distinct crop types. Analysis of these raids revealed varying frequencies across different crop categories, with vegetables being the most heavily targeted (31%), followed by pulses (22%) and cereals (20%). Our study identifies priority tehsils and districts across different states in the country where studies aiming at nilgai-crop interactions, population dynamics, and movement ecology can be carried out to devise effective mitigation measures.
Funder
University Grants Commission
Publisher
Wildlife Information Liaison Development Society
Reference56 articles.
1. Acevedo, P., F. Quirós-Fernández, J. Casal & J. Vicente (2014). Spatial distribution of wild boar population abundance: Basic information for spatial epidemiology and wildlife management. Ecological Indicators 36: 594–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.019
2. Alexander, S.M. & M.S. Quinn (2008). Human-coyote (Canis latrans) interaction in Canadian urban parks and green space: Preliminary findings from a media-content analysis. In Proceedings of Canadian Parks for Tomorrow: 40th Anniversary Conference.
3. Anand, S. & S. Radhakrishna (2017). Investigating trends in human-wildlife conflict: is conflict escalation real or imagined? Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 10(2): 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2017.02.003
4. Aryal, A. (2007). Blue bull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) in Lumbini–a World heritage site of Nepal. TigerPaper 32: 4–9.
5. Athreya, V., A. Srivathsa, M. Puri, K.K. Karanth, N.S. Kumar & K.U. Karanth (2015). Spotted in the news: using media reports to examine leopard distribution, depredation, and management practices outside protected areas in Southern India. PLoS One 10(11): e0142647. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142647