Identifying plants for priority conservation in Samar Island Natural Park forests (the Philippines) over limestone using a localized conservation priority index

Author:

Buot, Jr. Inocencio E.ORCID,Marne G. Origenes ,Ren Divien R. Obeña ,Jonathan O. Hernandez ,Noba F. Hilvano ,Diana Shane A. Balindo ,Edelyn O. Echapare

Abstract

The escalating degradation of ecosystems and the consequent reduction in critical services essential for human communities are global concerns. This study aimed to identify top-priority plants for conservation using a localized conservation priority index (LCPI), customized for the locality. The LCPI, a point scoring method, ranked 50 evaluated species based on criteria such as harvesting risk, economic and cultural use, species distribution, and frequency value. Thirteen species were classified as high priority, requiring stringent harvesting regulations, while the remaining 37 were designated at a medium priority level, allowing specific quotas for harvesting. Notably, all 13 high-priority species exhibited higher harvesting risks. These include Caryota rumphiana Mart., Aquilaria cumingiana (Decne.) Ridl., Cycas riuminiana Regel, Dracaena angustifolia (Medik.) Roxb., Oncosperma tigillarium (Jack) Ridl., Oreocnide rubescens (Blume) Miq., Kleinhovia hospita L., Diospyros blancoi A.DC., Codiaeum sp., Gymnostoma rumphianum (Miq.) L.A.S.Johnson, Caryota cumingii Lodd. ex Mart., Artocarpus rubrovenius Warb., and Palaquium sp. Local communities engage in harvesting all parts of certain plant species. Following the identification of priority plants, geotagging was employed to enhance targeted in situ conservation efforts, providing valuable guidance for local leaders in initiating localized conservation of threatened biodiversity.

Publisher

Wildlife Information Liaison Development Society

Reference76 articles.

1. Amaral, I. (2014). Encyclopedia of social media and Politics: Geotagging. SAGE Publications, Inc. pp 575-576; https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452244723.n230

2. Anyanwu, J.C., G.E. Amaku, L.C. Izunobi, I.O. Egbuawa, & S.M. Onwuagba (2016). Impact of deforestation on biodiversity in Anambra State, Nigeria. International Journal of Ecology and Ecosolution Vol. 3(3): 40–44

3. Bellard, C., C. Bertelsmeier, P. Leadley, W. Thuiller & F. Courchamp (2012). Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecology Letters 15(4): 365–377.

4. Brink, M., P.C.M. Jansen & C.H. Bosch (2003). Oreocnide rubescens (Blume) Miq. In: Brink, M and Escobin, R.P. (Editors): Plant Resources of South-East Asia No 17: Fibre plants. PROSEA Foundation, Bogor, Indonesia. Database record: prota4u.org/prosea

5. Brown, W.H. (1921). Minor products of Philippine Forest. Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Bureau of Forestry 2: 421 pp.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3