Abstract
Objective: The present work aims to analyze the territorial inequalities of public policies for access to water through the territorial approach.
Theoretical framework: This study is conducted based on theoretical reflections about geographic knowledge about space and territory, the latter as primordial in the analysis of power relations in the management, access and use of water. The theoretical framework uses the contributions of some of the authors who discuss the territory, among them: Haesbaert (2004), Folcault (1989) Saquet (2010) and Araújo (2000).
Method: It is based on the use of data collection with mapping and theoretical discussion. It seeks to analyze the inequalities and diversities of territorialities in the territory(ies), inquiries are made about territorial development through public policies mediated with the contributions of geographic science, data collection on the construction of cisterns is used in the northeast of Brazil, as well as the mapping of areas most affected by droughts in the northeast.
Results and conclusion: As a result, the theoretical analysis of approaches to territorial development and public policies allied to geographic knowledge permeates the production of space and the phenomena caused in rural areas.
Research implications: We understand that the territory is historically built by power relations, the territorial approach to development arises from the proposition of working on intra-regional inequalities with a view to generating social participation and, in parallel, governance of social subjects with power public.
Originality/value: This research has social, economic and scientific value due to the originality of the discussions presented.
Publisher
RGSA- Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference19 articles.
1. Alcantara, F. V. (2013) Gestão Social nos Territórios Rurais: Limites e Possibilidades do Agreste de Alagoas. Tese de doutorado. UFS São Cristóvão.
2. Araújo, T. B. (2000). Ensaios sobre o desenvolvimento brasileiro: heranças e urgências. Rio de Janeiro. Editora Revan. 392p.
3. Brandão, C. A.(2007) Território e Desenvolvimento: as múltiplas escalas entre o local e o global. 1. ed. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp, v. 1. 157 p
4. Cardoso, L. G. L., & Bosco, M. G. D. (2023). Commodity, Property, or Right: What is the Legal Nature of Land in Brazil?. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 17(6), e03267. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n6-028
5. Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1996). Mil Platôs – Capitalismo e Esquizofrenia: vol.3. Rio de Janeiro: 34.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献