Author:
Truong Anh Thi Thuy,La Ly Thi Bac,Nguyen Nga Thi Thu,Thi Phuong Ngo,Nguyen Thang The
Abstract
Objective: This article deals with the development of lucid expressions for 5- to 6-year-old preschool children in urban, mountainous, and rural areas.
Method: The methodology adopted for this research comprises imperical method. Data collection was carried out through questionnaires.
Results and Discussion: The results show that the children in the city area have a good level of lucid expression compared with the other two groups living in mountainous and rural areas. The lucid expression also shows that a good level of lucid expression is not only a sign that the psychological aspects of the child have improved and clearly developed in terms of quality, but also an extremely valuable piece, helping children to be confident when entering higher education levels.
Research Implications: There is a need for more in-depth studies on issues related to the development of lucid expressions, not only in the composition, characteristics, and structure of language, but also studies on the environment and other factors influencing factors, from which profound conclusions can be applied to the practice of language development.
Originality/Value: This study contributes to the practice by providing evidence of lucid speech development that can help teachers, educationists find suitable ways and aspects to help children have better expressions in their speeches.
Publisher
RGSA- Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental
Reference25 articles.
1. Borisova, N., Zakharova, T., & Pepik, L. (2022). The Organisation of Comprehensive Remote Support of Pre-school Children with Speech Disorders. Proceedings of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference “Current Problems of Social and Labour Relations" (ISPC-CPSLR 2021), 646, 64–68. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220208.011
2. Craig, H. K., & Washington, J. A. (2002). Oral language expectations for African American preschoolers and kindergartners. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2002/007)
3. Dockrell, J. E. (2001). Assessing Language Skills in Preschool Children. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 6(2), 74–85. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S1360641701002532
4. Dröes, R. M., Bengtsson, J. E., Meiland, F., Haaker, T., Moelaert, F., Mulvenna, M., & Nugent, C. (2015). Evaluation of UNICEF-Supported MOET’s Initiative of Mother Tongue Based Bilingual Education in Viet Nam 2006-2014. December, 2006–2014.
5. Eisenberg, S. L., Guo, L.-Y., & Mucchetti, E. (2018). Eliciting the Language Sample for Developmental Sentence Scoring: A Comparison of Play With Toys and Elicited Picture Description. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(2), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0161