In Vitro Analysis of Genotoxic Effects of Dental Panoramic Radiography: Evidence of Potential Genotoxicity Using the Comet Test
-
Published:2023-01-04
Issue:1
Volume:17
Page:e03108
-
ISSN:1981-982X
-
Container-title:Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:RGSA
Author:
de Oliveira Welison AbreuORCID, Vasconcelos Carolina PinheiroORCID, Sagica Fernanda do Espirito SantoORCID, De Oliveira Edivaldo Herculano CorreaORCID
Abstract
Objective: To test the genotoxic potential of panoramic radiography using the comet test. Methods: An in vitro cell line derived from the human periodontal ligament was subjected to two exposure times - 0.7 and 2.5 seconds. The data obtained were analyzed using the KOMET 6® program. Results and Conclusion: Although no significant differences were observed in cells exposed for 2.5 seconds in relation to the control, the exposure interval of 0.7 seconds produced a statistically higher amount of DNA damage than in the control. Thus, we confirm the potential genotoxicity of panoramic radiography. The presence of greater amount of DNA damage at the shortest exposure interval can be explained by the fact that the damage levels must reach a threshold to activate the DNA repair system, which would have happened at the longer exposure interval. Originality/Value: Previous studies were based only on the micronucleus assay and presented conflicting results. The comet test can detect both single-strand and double-strand breaks.
Publisher
RGSA- Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference26 articles.
1. Agarwal, P., Vinuth, D. P., Haranal, S., Thippanna, C. K., Naresh, N., & Moger, G. (2015). Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of X-ray on buccal epithelial cells following panoramic radiography: A pediatric study. Journal of cytology, 32(2), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.160559. 2. Angelieri, F., de Oliveira, G. R., Sannomiya, E. K., & Ribeiro, D. A. (2007). DNA damage and cellular death in oral mucosa cells of children who have undergone panoramic dental radiography. Pediatric radiology, 37(6), 561–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0478-1. 3. Angelieri, F., de Cássia Gonçalves Moleirinho, T., Carlin, V., Oshima, C. T., & Ribeiro, D. A. (2010). Biomonitoring of oral epithelial cells in smokers and non-smokers submitted to panoramic X-ray: comparison between buccal mucosa and lateral border of the tongue. Clinical oral investigations, 14(6), 669–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0345-6. 4. Azqueta, A., Arbillaga, L., López de Cerain, A., & Collins, A. (2013). Enhancing the sensitivity of the comet assay as a genotoxicity test, by combining it with bacterial repair enzyme FPG. Mutagenesis, 28(3), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/get002. 5. Azqueta, A., Langie, S. A. S., Boutet-Robinet, E., Duthie, S., Ladeira, C., Møller, P., Collins, A. R., Godschalk, R. W. L., & Working Group 5 of the hCOMET project (CA15132) (2019). DNA repair as a human biomonitoring tool: Comet assay approaches. Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research, 781, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.03.002.
|
|