The Conceptual Evolution of The Agribusiness Field of Study: From The Emergence of The Term to 2020
-
Published:2024-07-17
Issue:4
Volume:18
Page:e07766
-
ISSN:1981-982X
-
Container-title:Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:RGSA
Author:
Mühl Diego DuranteORCID, Schultz GlaucoORCID, Oliveira Letícia deORCID
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the evolution of research trends in the field of agribusiness, identifying the most studied terms and themes from the conception of the term agribusiness up to the year 2020.
Theoretical Framework: In the integration of agriculture into industrial chains, the concepts of Agribusiness and Filière emerge. Gradually, an interdisciplinary field of study is structured. However, new elements begin to be faced: socio-environmental issues and technological development alter the dynamics of this field of study. Thus, it is necessary to structure a comprehensive knowledge of Agribusiness to understand this dynamic.
Method: The methodology adopted for this research comprises bibliometric analysis in time series, using particularly the co-word technique. Data collection was carried out through the Scopus database, chosen for providing a broad view of the global and interdisciplinary scientific literature.
Results and Discussion: Terms such as "agribusiness," "agriculture," and "agroindustry" form the core of studies. The terms "animal," "economy/economic impact," and "supply chains" stand out for their high occurrence in all the periods analyzed.
Research Implications: A constancy of central themes and an evolution of peripheral themes in response to new environmental and technological challenges in agribusiness were observed.
Originality/Value: This study contributes to the literature as one of the first articles exploring the dynamics and evolution of an interdisciplinary research field using bibliometric techniques.
Publisher
RGSA- Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental
Reference59 articles.
1. Adamic, L. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2002). Zipf’s law and the Internet. Glottometrics, 3(1), 143–150. 2. Afrianto, I., Djatna, T., Arkeman, Y., Hermadi, I., & Sitanggang, I. S. (2020). Block chain technology architecture for supply chain traceability of fisheries products in indonesia: Future challenge. Em Journal of engineering science and technology (Vol. 15, Números 5, SI, p. 41–49). taylors univ sdn bhd. 3. Albright, K., McClelland, J. F., & Young, W. H. (1977). Cooperation between agroindustry and the UN. Food Policy, 2(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9192(77)90007-0 4. Awan, S., Ahmed, S., Ullah, F., Nawaz, A., Khan, A., Uddin, M. I., Alharbi, A., Alosaimi, W., & Alyami, H. (2021). IoT with BlockChain: A Futuristic Approach in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain. Em Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (Vol. 2021). Hindawi Limited. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5580179 5. Belussi, F., Orsi, L., & Savarese, M. (2019). Mapping Business Model Research: A Document Bibliometric Analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(3), 101048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2019.101048
|
|