Microbial Cross-Feeding and its Effects on Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata) Plant Growth Promotion
-
Published:2023-09-13
Issue:9
Volume:17
Page:e04126
-
ISSN:1981-982X
-
Container-title:Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:RGSA
Author:
Silva Valéria Maria AraújoORCID, Bandeira Leonardo LimaORCID, De Sousa Juliani BarbosaORCID, Dos Santos Franciandro DantasORCID, Cavalcante Fernando GouveiaORCID, Fernandes Júnior Paulo IvanORCID, Martins Claudia MirandaORCID, Martins Suzana Cláudia SilveiraORCID
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the in vitro metabolic compartmentalization between strains of actinobacteria and rhizobia isolated from Brazilian semiarid soils and observe the effect of their coinoculation on the development of cowpea plants.
Theoretical Framework: The study is based on the importance of microbial interactions in soil, such as metabolite and enzyme sharing, for nutrient cycling and plant growth promotion.
Method: Twenty-six rhizobial strains and 23 actinobacteria were cocultured in vitro in media containing xylan, pectin and calcium phosphate. Strains were characterized regarding compatibility on different substrates. Two Streptomyces sp. strains and eight Bradyrhizobium sp. strains were selected and coinoculated in cowpea plants in a greenhouse to evaluate plant development and gas exchange.
Results: Compatibility between strains varied significantly among the tested substrates, being higher in pectin and phosphate. Coinoculation resulted in increased values of several biometric parameters compared to standard treatments with only rhizobia or nitrogen fertilization.
Conclusions: The association of microorganisms with distinct metabolic capabilities, such as enzyme production, promotes bacterial coexistence and facilitates plant development through complementarity mechanisms.
Originality: There are scarce studies on metabolic interactions and growth promotion involving actinobacteria and rhizobia from semiarid soils.
Publisher
RGSA- Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference55 articles.
1. Alves, D. A. S., Martins, C. M., Cavalcante, F. G., Ramos, K. A., Silva, L. L., Menezes, F. G. R., . . . & Martins, S. C. S. (2016). Produção de celulase e amilase por actinobactérias do semiárido brasileiro. Revista Enciclopédia Biosfera, 13(24), 1303-1315. 2. Amor, D. R., & Bello, M. D. (2019). Bottom-up approaches to synthetic cooperation in microbial communities. Life, 9(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/life9010022 3. Araújo, A. S. F., Oliveira, T. S., Silva, M. G. C., Santos, V. M., Freitas, D. A. F., Giongo, V., . . . & Lopes, L. C. (2013). Soil microbial properties and temporal stability in degraded and restored lands of Northeast Brazil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 66, 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.07.012 4. Ayangbenro, A. S., & Babalola, O. O. (2020). Reclamation of arid and semi-arid soils: The role of plant growth-promoting archaea and bacteria. Current Plant Biology, 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2020.100173 5. Baldrian, P. (2017). Forest microbiome: diversity, complexity and dynamics. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 41(2), 109-130. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuw040
|
|