Author:
Soeseno Ambar,Wibowo Basuki Rekso,Suganda Atma,Maryano
Abstract
Purpose: Corruption remains pervasive in Indonesia, damaging the nation's finances and economy while infringing on the economic and social rights of the community. This study aims to explore efficient criminal sanctions to eradicate corruption in Indonesia, particularly focusing on the application of the death penalty.
Theoretical Framework: This study employs normative legal research and secondary information based on literature to analyze the application of criminal sanctions for acts of corruption.
Method: The research utilizes a data analysis technique involving problem identification, data gathering, data reduction, conclusion formulation, and verification.
Result and Discussion: The study concludes that emphasizing the law's provisions is crucial for applying the death penalty to corruption cases. This has led to the Constitutional Court amending Articles 603 and 604 of the Criminal Code to include the threat of the death penalty. However, there is a debate among law enforcement officials regarding the violation of human rights (HAM) that could occur with the implementation of the death penalty. Therefore, revisions to the Criminal Code's articles are proposed to facilitate the death penalty's implementation, considering the quality and quantity of corrupt individuals.
Conclusion: The anticipated outcome is that authorities will use the death penalty as a symbol of their commitment to combatting worsening corruption annually in Indonesia.
Publisher
RGSA- Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental
Reference20 articles.
1. Aladdin, Y., & Hanafi, D. (2023). Memaknai Pemberitaan Wacana Hukuman Mati Koruptor pada Media Republika. CoverAge: Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.35814/coverage.v13i2.4380
2. Bassang, T. J. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Deelneming. Lex Crimen, IV(5), 122–128.
3. Budi Kartika, F., & Gunawan, B. I. (2020). Politik Hukum PemberantasaTindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Keterkaitannya Dengan Pertumbuhan Eonomi Iindonesia (Khususnya Provinsi Sumatera Utara). Jurnal Lex Justitia, 2(1), 27–47.
4. Bunga, M., Dg Maroa, M., Arief, A., & Djanggih, H. (2019). Urgensi Peran Serta Masyarakat Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Law Reform: Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 15(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23356
5. Grigorius, E. S., & Kholiq, M. N. (2021). Penerapan Hukuman Mati Bagi Pelaku Kejahatan Korupsi Dana Bantuan Sosial. Jurnal Legislatif, 5(1), 1–16.