Sowing Management and Plant Population in Organic Quinoa Production for Food and Nutrition Security
-
Published:2023-08-30
Issue:8
Volume:17
Page:e04002
-
ISSN:1981-982X
-
Container-title:Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:RGSA
Author:
Da Rosa Juliana AozaneORCID, Da Silva José Antonio GonzalezORCID, Carvalho Ivan RicardoORCID, Magano Deivid AraújoORCID, Peter Cibele LuisaORCID, Babeski Cristhian MilbradtORCID, Diel PedroORCID, Heusner Lisa BrönstrupORCID
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the population density of quinoa plants sown by broadcasting or in rows to improve agronomic indicators of an organic farming system focused on increasing food and nutrition security of the population.
Method/design/approach: The study was conducted in 2020, in Augusto Pestana, RS, Brazil, using a randomized block experimental design with four replications, in a 2×4 factorial arrangement consisted of 2 sowing methods (sowing in rows spaced 0.20 m apart and by hand broadcasting) and 4 plant population densities (10, 40, 80, and 120 plants m-2). Thinning was performed in the plots of both sowing methods approximately 20 days after emergence for achieving the desired plant densities. Grain yield and other traits of agronomic interest were evaluated under an organic cropping system.
Results and conclusion: The arrangement of 70 quinoa plants m-2 through sowing in rows or by broadcasting ensures satisfactory crop yields without using pesticides and synthetic fertilizers. The incorporation of these more sustainable practices into quinoa production systems contributes to the promotion of agroecological and organic agriculture, resulting in a high-quality nutraceutical food.
Originality/value: This study provides significant contribution to the advancement of research on quinoa in Brazil, bringing new information benefiting farmers, technical assistance agents, and the food industry and improving the production system efficiency to ensure food and nutrition security and care for the environment and society.
Publisher
RGSA- Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference49 articles.
1. Basso, N. C. F., Babeski, C. M., Heuser, L. B., Zardin, N. G., Bandeira, W. J. A., Carvalho, I. R., Colet, C. F., & da Silva, J. A. G. (2022). A produção sem agrotóxicos no controle de doenças foliares da aveia: indutor de resistência por silício e potássio e zona de escape. Research, Society and Development, 11(8), e47611831191. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i8.31191 2. Bender, S. F., Wagg, C., & van der Heijden, M. G. (2016). An underground revolution: biodiversity and soil ecological engineering for agricultural sustainability. Trends in ecology & evolution, 31(6), 440-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.016 3. Biel, W., Kazimierska, K., & Bashutska, U. (2020). Nutritional value of wheat, triticale, barley and oat grains. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Zootechnica, 19(2), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.21005/asp.2020.19.2.03 4. Borba, B. C. R. de, Oliveira, R. C. de, & Correa, D. (2023). Doença Celíaca e Sensibilidade ao Glúten: Revisão Narrativa e Desenvolvimento de Material Educativo. Epitaya E-Books, 1(27), 96-111. https://doi.org/10.47879/ed.ep.2023670p96 5. Brakez, M., Daoud, S., Harrouni, M. C., Tachbibi, N., & Brakez, Z. (2016). Nutritional value of chenopodium quinoa seeds obtained from an open field culture under saline conditions. In: Halophytes for food security in dry lands, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801854-5.00003-0
|
|