ST&I Public Policies: A Bibliometric Study of Scientific Production

Author:

De Paulo Richard CoelhoORCID,Rabelo Thamiris Thatianne de AraújoORCID,Dias Françoan de OliveiraORCID,Vilela Junior Dalton ChavesORCID,Mafra Rosana ZauORCID

Abstract

Objective: Carry out a bibliometric study of the scientific production on Public Policies for Science, Technology and Innovation (ST&I), in the Web of Science database, in the period from 2013 to 2022.   Theoretical framework: Is based on the literature on Public Policies for Science, Technology and Innovation and the history of Public Policies for Innovation in Brazil.   Method: This research is classified as descriptive and quantitative. Data were collected from the Web of Science database by accessing the Journal Portal of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, with a time frame between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2022. They were used for data analysis. RStudio® and VOSviewer® software and bibliometric packages Bibliometrix and Biblioshiny.   Results and conclusion: 94 documents were identified, with the largest scientific productions on the subject coming from Brazil, China, Spain and Japan. In 2021, it was the year with the most cited documents, followed by 2020. The most cited sources are: Research Policy followed by Technological Forecasting and Social Change. The main co-occurrences of keywords are: science; innovation; technology; innovation policy; and, public policy. With regard to co-authorship between countries, there is a prevalence with China. The most relevant authors on the subject are: [Anonymous] A.; and Alvarez I. Regarding co-citation between authors, there was a prevalence of(e): Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; Lundvall, B.A.; and, Borras, S. As for the most cited studies globally on the subject in the last ten years at the international level, there are: Padilla-Pérez, R. (2014); Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2016); and Ozkaya, G. (2021). Finally, it is concluded that this study aims to improve the knowledge base on Public Policies for Science, Technology and Innovation and the field of related studies.   Search Implications: The main limitation of this search is that it was restricted to the Web of Science, where most of the documents were articles. Therefore, it would be interesting to consider a broader line of research that includes other databases, such as Scopus or Google Scholar, in addition to other types of publications, such as books or conference proceedings.   Originality/Value: This study aims to improve the knowledge base on Public Policies for Science, Technology and Innovation and the field of related studies.

Publisher

RGSA- Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference52 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3