Abstract
Objective: This work aims to present and describe the process of identifying and classifying environmental aspects in a Brazilian dry port.
Theoretical Framework: The Climate Change Adaptation Strategies aim to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, increase the share of renewable energy in total energy production and increase the energy efficiency. Unfortunately, road-based dry ports increase heavy truck congestion, energy consumption and, inherently, GHG emissions.
Method: The general approach includes a literature review on the importance of managing environmental aspects and impacts in dry ports, followed by the description of the holistic procedure that involves the inventory of port activities linked to environmental aspects, the Leopold matrix and specialized knowledge about the local context (e.g., compliance with law, regional climate change adaptation strategy, stakeholder concerns) to perform the classification.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that atmospheric emissions, noise and resource consumption are among the most significant environmental aspects of dry port. The absence of a railway that enables a multimodal transport system and the fact that the port is located in the city center constitute a disadvantage that worsens road congestion and air emissions, since the train would reduce GHG emissions.
Research Implications: The work contributes to the planning and management of the activities of Foz do Iguaçu Dry Port considering environmental aspects and impacts, direct and indirect, from a holistic perspective.
Originality/Value: The work presents a ranking of the environmental aspects and impacts of dry port to help defining priority actions in light of climate change strategies.
Publisher
RGSA- Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental
Reference9 articles.
1. Association of American Railroads - AoAR (2018). The environmental benefits of moving freight by rail. Retrived from https://www.aar.org/data/environmental-benefits-moving-freight-rail/
2. Darbra, R.M., Ronza, A., Casal, J., Stojanovic, T.A., & Wooldridge, C. (2005). A new methodology to assess environmental management in sea ports. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 48(8), 420-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2003.10.023
3. Darbra, R.M., Ronza, A., Stojanovic, T.A., Wooldridge, C., & Casal, J. (2005). A procedure for identifying significant environmental aspects in sea ports. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50(8), 866-874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.04.037
4. ECO-Information (1998). Self Diagnosis Method 1998. Strategic analysis questionnaire for the (environmental) port manager. Brussels: ESPO.
5. Glasson, J., Therivel, R., & Chadwick, A. (1994). Environmental Impact Assessment, 2nd edition. Philadelphia: UCL Press.