Participatory Democracy in Florianópolis: The Experience of Participatory Budgeting Based on Law no. 14.061/2018

Author:

Melo Milena PettersORCID,De Lima Rafael Hamilton FernandesORCID

Abstract

Objective: Analyze participatory democracy and highlight the municipality, as a fruitful space for the realization of citizenship, through popular participation in public management, focusing on the institute of participatory budgeting in decision-making and the experience of Florianópolis, considering the five years of validity of the Municipal law 14.061/2018.   Theoretical framework: Supported by the theoretical legacy of Paulo Bonavides, the research seeks to stimulate critical reflection on participatory democracy in Brazilian constitutionalism and the exercise of citizenship at the local level. Starting from the understanding that the Constitution and the Democratic Rule of Law in the Brazilian federative model find a privileged space for action in the municipality and, therefore, are also carried out through local constitutional policies, the research considers the need to establish instruments that enable the implementation of participatory democracy, especially when it comes to cities and citizenship such as social inclusion, political participation, and community integration. In this sense, participatory budgeting is presented as an effective means of stimulating popular participation at the municipal level.   Method: Contextualized within the disciplinary scope of Constitutional Law, from the methodological perspective of the study of Law as constitutional policy, this article is the result of bibliographical and document research, with the application of the hypothetical-deductive method, also involving the collection of data relating to the budget participatory in the Capital of Santa Catarina and the analysis of its correlation with popular participation.   Results and conclusion: The standardization of the participatory budget gave greater legitimacy and, in fact, stimulated popular participation. Greater community integration was also noted, observing that the participatory budget is a useful instrument for optimizing the basic precepts of participatory democracy and the Democratic Rule of Law.   Research implications: By analyzing the experience of the Capital of Santa Catarina, it is expected to contribute significantly to the visualization of the potentialities and weaknesses of using the participatory budgeting institute in Brazilian municipalities, as an expression of participatory democracy and active citizenship at the local level.   Originality/value: The research is part of the study of practices for the consolidation of the Democratic State in Brazilian federalism and participatory democracy at the municipal level. The study is relevant not only for understanding participatory budgeting in the municipality of Florianópolis, as it provides support for reflecting on local democracy in Brazilian municipalities, as the debate regarding popular legitimacy in administrative decision-making has been growing.

Publisher

RGSA- Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference43 articles.

1. Alexy, R. (1993). Teoria de Los Derechos Fundamentales. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales. n.34.

2. Andrade, V. R. P. D. (1993). Cidadania: do direito aos direitos humanos. São Paulo: Acadêmica.

3. Andrade, V. R. P. D (1992). Cidadania e Democracia: repensando as condições de possibilidade da democracia no Brasil a partir da cidadania. Revista Jurídica da UNOESC, Chapecó, (1), 10-14.

4. Amirante, C. (2004). Cittadinanza (Teoria Generale). Enciclopedia Giuridica, Volume XII. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.

5. Avritzer, L. (2003). O orçamento participativo e a teoria democrática: um balanço crítico. A inovação democrática no Brasil. São Paulo: Cortez, 13-60.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparison of Political Dynasty in Indonesia and the United States;Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental;2024-01-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3