Sustainability Index as A Proposal for Socio-Environmental Evaluation of The Performance of The State Court of Justice of Alagoas-Brazil

Abstract

Purpose: Analyze sustainability in the socio-environmental management of the judiciary, from the perspective of indicators defined by the National Council of Justice (CNJ) and propose a sustainability index for the socio-environmental management of the PJ.   Theoretical framework: Indicators are present in everyone's lives, they are everywhere. They are considered a management tool. Models for assessing sustainability through specific indicators and indices have been the subject of study in several studies, from the perspective of different dimensions.   Method: Application of the methodology proposed by Calório (1997), combined with Daniel et al (2001), Sobral, Almeida and Gomes (2012), Faccioli and Gomes (2021) and adaptations, with 21 indicators in the environmental, economic and social dimensions in 9 categories defined by the CNJ aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). The Sustainability Index, its classification and scenario analysis are obtained.   Results and discussion: An index and model aimed at evaluating the socio-environmental sustainability of the judiciary is presented, in which the general sustainability index - IS0-100 was 20.24%, a level considered bad and classified as a pessimistic scenario, pointing out a warning for the economic and environmental dimensions, in the categories: paper, disposable cups, electricity and mineral water, due to expenses/consumption. The indicators consumption of returnable packaging for mineral water (IA9) and expenditure on mineral water in returnable packaging (IE8) presented the highest level of unsustainability (0.0%).   Implications of the research: This research demonstrated that the methodology can be applied to the Judiciary sphere, in the Courts of Justice, and that it has implications in the form of monitoring, and can be used as a parameter for evaluating sustainability in socio-environmental management and contribute to decision-making.   Originality/value: The literature is silent in relation to socio-environmental management in the judiciary with the SDGs, there is a lack of studies to assess sustainability. Thus, the knowledge developed in this research fills a gap by proposing a Sustainability Index for this sphere of power.