Abstract
This editorial presents eight concept analysis methods for use in nursing research and education. In addition to the two classical methods of Walker and Avant’s and Rodgers’ concept analysis approaches that are typically utilized in nursing education and briefly discussed within this editorial, six additional methods are also presented including Schwartz-Barcott and Kim’s Hybrid model, Chinn and Kramer’s approach, Simultaneous Concept Analysis, Pragmatic Utility, Principle-Based Concept Analysis, and Semantic Concept Analysis. By familiarizing nursing educators, researchers, and students with these methods, educators can enhance their critical thinking and understanding of complex nursing concepts, preparing them for enhanced, multi-faceted contributions to nursing science.
Funder
Second Century Fund (C2F), Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Reference22 articles.
1. Almerud Österberg, S., Hörberg, U., Ozolins, L.-L., Werkander Harstäde, C., & Elmqvist, C. (2023). Exposed–a semantic concept analysis of its origin, meaning change over time and its relevance for caring science. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 18(1), 2163701. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2022.2163701
2. Chinn, P. L., & Jacobs, M. K. (1987). Theory and nursing: A systematic approach (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
3. Chinn, P. L., & Kramer, M. K. (1995). Theory and nursing: A systematic approach (4th ed.). St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby.
4. Eriksson, K. (2010). Concept determination as part of the development of knowledge in caring science. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 24(s1), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00809.x
5. Ghadirian, F., Salsali, M., & Cheraghi, M. A. (2014). Nursing professionalism: An evolutionary concept analysis. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 19(1), 1-10.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献