Perception and knowledge of Saudi women about water birth: A cross-sectional study

Author:

Bashaikh SajaORCID,Mahboub FouziaORCID,Orabi AbeerORCID

Abstract

Background: Water birth has been considered an efficient non-pharmacological modality with numerous maternal and neonatal benefits as well as rare complications. Perception and knowledge about water birth can affect women’s decisions in the future. Few available studies addressed this area in Saudi Arabia. Thus, the current research fills this gap and contributes to further understanding this phenomenon. Objective: This study aimed to assess the perception and knowledge of Saudi women about water birth. Methods: A cross-sectional study was employed among 388 Saudi women conveniently enrolled for the study. An online questionnaire that included four sections: sociodemographic characteristics, obstetrical history, perception, and knowledge of water birth, was used for data collection. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations) and inferential statistics (Chi-Square, Fisher Exact, and t-tests) were used for data analysis. Results: The participants’ mean age was 34.91 ± 8.851, with 83.2% of them highly educated. The mean number of deliveries was 3.36 ± 2.167, with 60% having no history of abortion. Less than half of the participants (40.2%) preferred to have a water delivery. Of the total participants, 96.4% had a fair knowledge level, and 3.6% had a good knowledge of water delivery. A significant relationship was found between age, educational course, and the knowledge of the participants about water delivery (p <0.05). Conclusion: Most Saudi women had a fair knowledge of water birth; however, they wanted more information on it. It is recommended that midwives and nurses broaden their understanding of water birth and enhance its practice in order to educate and inspire women to make informed decisions about all available childbirth delivery methods, including water birth.

Publisher

Belitung Raya Foundation

Subject

General Nursing

Reference26 articles.

1. Akhlaghi, A., Kasiri, H., Nikzad, E., Chaichian, S., Fekrat, M., & Mehdizadeh, A. (2017). Comparison of waterbirth with conventional vaginal delivery: A non-randomized controlled trial from Iran. https://waterbirth.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Iran-waterbirth-trial.pdf

2. Al Masoud, N. H. (2020). A quantitative study: Exploring staff nurse and midwife attitudes to and knowledge of waterbirth in Saudi Arabia. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science, 10(5), 59-73.

3. Brooks, E. J. (2018). Water birth: Using water as a comfort measure in labor. International Journal of Childbirth Education, 33(1), 30-34.

4. Carlsson, T., & Ulfsdottir, H. (2020). Waterbirth in low‐risk pregnancy: An exploration of women’s experiences. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(5), 1221-1231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14336

5. Cooper, M., & Warland, J. (2019). What are the benefits? Are they concerned? Women's experiences of water immersion for labor and birth. Midwifery, 79, 102541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.102541

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3