Author:
Aganyira K.,Kabumbuli R.,Muwanika V.B.,Nampanzira D.,Tabuti J.R.S.,Sheil D.
Abstract
Payment for environmental services (PES) projects can potentially improve environmental and livelihood outcomes. While pilot projects offer valuable lessons, these are often lost especially if the project fails. Here we assess how and why a forest-for-carbon linked charcoal production
project, developed in Central Uganda under the Clean Development Mechanism, failed to achieve its goals (e.g.collaborative establishment of a charcoal production plantation using indigenous species and improved forest protection). We draw upon interviews and focus group discussions with project
participants, non-participants and forest authorities. Findings suggest that inadequate project benefits, conflicts over project goals, distrust, poor communication and weak institutional capacity undermined the likelihood of project success. Most shortcomings were evident before the project
started. Our conclusion is that projects must invest in recognising and addressing challenges in advance. In addition, good pre-implementation assessments, as well as transparent and accountable decision procedures would improve project outcomes.
Publisher
Commonwealth Forestry Association
Subject
Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Forestry,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Forestry
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献