Affiliation:
1. Columbia University
2. Microsoft
3. DSI, Columbia University
Abstract
Although dominant for tabular data, ML libraries that train tree models over normalized databases (e.g., LightGBM, XGBoost) require the data to be denormalized as a single table, materialized, and exported. This process is not scalable, slow, and poses security risks. In-DB ML aims to train models within DBMSes to avoid data movement and provide data governance. Rather than modify a DBMS to support In-DB ML, is it possible to offer competitive tree training performance to specialized ML libraries...with only SQL?
We present JoinBoost, a Python library that rewrites tree training algorithms over normalized databases into pure SQL. It is portable to any DBMS, offers performance competitive with specialized ML libraries, and scales with the underlying DBMS capabilities. JoinBoost extends prior work from both algorithmic and systems perspectives. Algorithmically, we support factorized gradient boosting, by updating the
Y
variable to the residual in the
non-materialized join result.
Although this view update problem is generally ambiguous, we identify
addition-to-multiplication preserving
, the key property of variance semi-ring to support
rmse
the most widely used criterion. System-wise, we identify residual updates as a performance bottleneck. Such overhead can be natively minimized on columnar DBMSes by creating a new column of residual values and adding it as a projection. We validate this with two implementations on DuckDB, with no or minimal modifications to its internals for portability. Our experiment shows that JoinBoost is 3× (1.1×) faster for random forests (gradient boosting) compared to LightGBM, and over an order of magnitude faster than state-of-the-art In-DB ML systems. Further, JoinBoost scales well beyond LightGBM in terms of the # features, DB size (TPC-DS SF=1000), and join graph complexity (galaxy schemas).
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Water Science and Technology,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference70 articles.
1. 2006. Updates through views: A new hope . In 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'06) . IEEE, 2--2. 2006. Updates through views: A new hope. In 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'06). IEEE, 2--2.
2. 2013. IMDB. https://www.imdb.com/interfaces/. 2013. IMDB. https://www.imdb.com/interfaces/.
3. 2017. Corporación Favorita Grocery Sales Forecasting. https://www.kaggle.com/c/favorita-grocery-sales-forecasting. 2017. Corporación Favorita Grocery Sales Forecasting. https://www.kaggle.com/c/favorita-grocery-sales-forecasting.
4. 2017. Lightgbm memory explodes in start train. https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/issues/1032. 2017. Lightgbm memory explodes in start train. https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/issues/1032.
5. 2020. Looker data modeling. https://www.looker.com/platform/data-modeling/. 2020. Looker data modeling. https://www.looker.com/platform/data-modeling/.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. In-Database Data Imputation;Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data;2024-03-12
2. Random Forests over normalized data in CPU-GPU DBMSes;Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop on Data Management on New Hardware;2023-06-18