Full-Power Graph Querying: State of the Art and Challenges

Author:

Manolescu Ioana1,Mohanty Madhulika1

Affiliation:

1. Inria and IPP, France

Abstract

Graph databases are enjoying enormous popularity, through both their RDF and Property Graphs (PG) incarnations, in a variety of applications. To query graphs, query languages provide structured, as well as unstructured primitives. While structured queries allow expressing precise information needs, they are unsuited for exploring unfamiliar datasets, as they require prior knowledge of the schema and structure of the dataset. Prior research on keyword search in graph databases do not suffer from this limitation. However, keyword queries do not allow expressing precise search criteria when users do know some.This tutorial (1.5 hours) builds a continuum between structured graph querying through languages such as SPARQL and GPML, a recently proposed standard for PG querying, on one hand, and graph keyword search, on the other hand. In this space between querying and information retrieval, we analyze the features of modern query languages that go toward unstructured search, discuss their strength, limitations, and compare their computational complexity. In particular, we focus on (i) lessons learned from the rich literature of graph keyword search, in particular with respect to result scoring; (ii) language mechanisms for integratingbothcomplex structured querying and powerful methods to search for connections users do not know in advance. We conclude by discussing the open challenges and future work directions.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Water Science and Technology,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference46 articles.

1. B. Aditya , Gaurav Bhalotia , Soumen Chakrabarti , Arvind Hulgeri , Charuta Nakhe , Parag, and S. Sudarshan . 2002 . BANKS: Browsing and Keyword Searching in Relational Databases. In VLDB. B. Aditya, Gaurav Bhalotia, Soumen Chakrabarti, Arvind Hulgeri, Charuta Nakhe, Parag, and S. Sudarshan. 2002. BANKS: Browsing and Keyword Searching in Relational Databases. In VLDB.

2. Christian Aebeloe Gabriela Montoya Vinay Setty and Katja Hose. 2018. Discovering Diversified Paths in Knowledge Bases. In VLDB. Christian Aebeloe Gabriela Montoya Vinay Setty and Katja Hose. 2018. Discovering Diversified Paths in Knowledge Bases. In VLDB.

3. Sanjay Agrawal Surajit Chaudhuri and Gautam Das. 2002. DBXplorer: A System for Keyword-Based Search over Relational Databases. In ICDE. Sanjay Agrawal Surajit Chaudhuri and Gautam Das. 2002. DBXplorer: A System for Keyword-Based Search over Relational Databases. In ICDE.

4. Angelos-Christos Anadiotis , Oana Balalau , Théo Bouganim , Francesco Chimienti , Helena Galhardas , Mhd Yamen Haddad , Stéphane Horel, Ioana Manolescu, and Youssr Youssef. 2021 . Empowering Investigative Journalism with Graph-based Heterogeneous Data Management. In Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering. IEEE Computer Society . Angelos-Christos Anadiotis, Oana Balalau, Théo Bouganim, Francesco Chimienti, Helena Galhardas, Mhd Yamen Haddad, Stéphane Horel, Ioana Manolescu, and Youssr Youssef. 2021. Empowering Investigative Journalism with Graph-based Heterogeneous Data Management. In Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering. IEEE Computer Society.

5. Angelos Christos Anadiotis Ioana Manolescu and Madhulika Mohanty. 2023. Integrating Connection Search in Graph Queries. In ICDE. Angelos Christos Anadiotis Ioana Manolescu and Madhulika Mohanty. 2023. Integrating Connection Search in Graph Queries. In ICDE.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3