Affiliation:
1. Università degli Studi di Genova DIRAAS
Abstract
Abstract The place of theatre in the Aeschines-Demosthenes dispute: the diplomatic perspective In all studies on the affinities and intersections, both thematic and performative, between oratory and theatre, the contrasting orations of Aeschines and Demosthenes concerning the embassies to Philip of 346 BC and the mutual accusations about the handling of negotiations hold an essential place. In this set of speeches, which includes – in addition to Aeschines’ Against Timarchus and the two orations On the False Embassy (343) – those of 330 Against Ctesiphon (Aeschines) and On the Crown (Demosthenes), the theatre and its performers are, however, represented ambiguously, if not negatively. This essay aims to highlight how this apparent paradox finds a possible solution by considering the concrete role that Athenian theatre and actors played in the difficult negotiations between Athens and Philip. The diplomatic perspective allows us to shed more light on the motivations that led the two rival orators to use theatre as a weapon to fight each other.
Publisher
Led Edizioni Universitarie
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,History,Language and Linguistics,Classics
Reference123 articles.
1. K. Apostolakis, Pitiable Dramas on the Podium of the Athenian Law Courts, in Papaioannou - Serafim - da Vela 2017, 133-156.
2. K. Apostolakis, Comic Invective and Public Speech in Fourth Century Athens, in Papaioannou - Serafim 2021, 43-63.
3. D. Bachmann-Medick, Cultural Turns: New Orientations in the Study of Culture, Berlin - Boston 2016.
4. E. Badian - J. Heskel, Aeschines 2.12-18: A Study in Rhetoric and Chronology, Phoenix 41.3 (1987), 264-271.
5. A. Bartzoka, Désigner chez les orateurs attiques les discours des ambassadeurs «ratés»: vocabulaire et figures, Historikà 10 (2020), 57-84.