Validation of «Tell Me How You Read» Reading Strategies Questionnaire for Upper-Secondary School Students

Author:

Castellana Giusi1,Mitrovic Snezana

Affiliation:

1. Roma Tre University,

Abstract

The study presents the factorial validity of the version of the questionnaire on reading strategies, «Tell me how to read», aimed at the students of upper-secondary schools. The dimensions investigated correspond to the 7 strategies already validated in the previous versions (lower secondary and primary school, pilot study; Castellana, 2018, 2020a; Castellana & Lucisano, 2021): Identifying reading purposes; Activating previous knowledge; Making predictions; Identifying the most important information; Using graphic organizers; Controlling, Monitoring and a scale on the perception of difficulty. The questionnaire consisting of 57 items, was administered to a convenience sample of 1527 students, attending upper-secondary school. Results of the factor analysis confirm the seven-dimensional structure while Cronbach’s alpha ranges from .836 to .925, with the total reliability coefficient of .933. Furthermore, data analyses reveal strengths and weaknesses of the readers in terms of the strategies they employ and suggest areas and paths for improvement of their reading skills, stressing once again the importance of tools aimed at measuring the use of metacognitive strategies.

Publisher

Led Edizioni Universitarie

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Social Psychology

Reference37 articles.

1. Barbaranelli, C. (2003). Analisi dei dati. Tecniche multivariate per la ricerca psicologica e sociale. Milano: LED Edizioni Universitarie.

2. Borkowski, J. G., & Muthukrishna, N. (2011). Didattica metacognitiva. Come insegnare strategie efficaci di apprendimento. Trento: Erickson.

3. Brown, A. L., Armbruster, B. B., & Baker, L. (1986). The role of metacognition in reading and studying. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Reading comprehension: From research to practice (pp. 49-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

4. Calvani, A. (2009). Teorie dell'istruzione e carico cognitivo. Trento: Erickson.

5. Calvani, A., & Chiappetta Cajola, L. (a cura di). (2019). Strategie efficaci per la comprensione del testo. Il Reciprocal Teaching. Firenze: S.Ap.I.E. Scientifica.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3