Criterion Validation of the Scales of Autonomy, Collaboration, Empathy, Problem-solving and Self-confidence of the 3SQ. Soft Skills Self-evaluation Questionnaire Adapted for Lower Secondary School

Author:

Scippo Stefano1,Rubat du Mérac Emiliane2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sapienza Università di Roma, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology (Italy)

2. Sapienza University

Abstract

The Soft Skills Self-evaluation Questionnaire (3SQ, 41 items) was validated using the responses of 1216 Italian students attending the fourth and the fifth grade of upper secondary school (Lucisano & du Mérac, 2019a), demonstrating good psychometric properties (du Mérac & De Santis, 2020; du Mérac, Livi, & Lucisano, 2020). The adaptation of the 3SQ (40 items) for 8th-grade students was validated in Rome using the responses of 507 students, confirming the factorial structure, sufficient independence, and a good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha between .75 and .92 and 52.23% of the total variance explained). Here, we present the criterion-related validity of the five scales of the adapted 3SQ: Self-confidence, Autonomy, Problem-solving, Cooperation, Empathy. During a PhD research project (Scippo, 2021), these dimensions were also measured in Rome with other instruments, using a sample of 403 8th grade students. The analysis of the data confirms good reliability of the five scales (between .79 and .92), shows good indices of the confirmatory factor analysis of all the scales (RMSEA = .05, SRMR = .08), and reveals significant correlations (between .38 and .68) between the scales of the adapted 3SQ and the other scales measuring the same dimensions. In conclusion, this concurrent validity check reinforces the validity of the adapted 3SQ construct and, consequently, its usefulness for both research and guidance.

Publisher

Led Edizioni Universitarie

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Social Psychology

Reference67 articles.

1. Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Bowen, K. R. (2002). What we really know about our abilities and our knowledge. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 587-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00174-X

2. Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

3. Anderson, A. B., Basilevsky, A., & Hum, D. P. J. (1983). Measurement: Theory and techniques. In P. H. Rossi, J. D. Wright, & A. B. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (pp. 231-287). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-598226-9.50013-6

4. Bailey, K. D. (1982). Methods of social research. New York: The Free Press (trad. it. Metodi della ricerca sociale, a cura di M. Rossi. Bologna: il Mulino, 1995).

5. Barbaranelli, C. (2003). Analisi dei dati. Tecniche multivariate per la ricerca psicolog-ica e sociale. Milano: LED Edizioni Universitarie.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Validazione e standardizzazione del questionario «Quin – Quando insegno»;Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal);2023-06-14

2. Influencia del interés por las artes visuales en las soft skills de los futuros maestros;TECHNO REVIEW. International Technology, Science and Society Review /Revista Internacional de Tecnología, Ciencia y Sociedad;2022-12-29

3. Developing emotionally competent engineers for the ever-changing built environment;Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management;2022-12-27

4. Pengembangan Skala Karakter Empati Siswa Kelas XI SMA;Nusantara of Research : Jurnal Hasil-hasil Penelitian Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri;2022-05-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3