Occupational Health and Safety during COVID-19: A Cross-National Comparison of Discursive and Communication Practices in Italy and the US

Author:

Manzella Pietro

Abstract

This paper examines legal communication in Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) discourse and investigates the rhetorical strategies implemented at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. To this end, the paper focuses on a dataset of legal provisions introduced as emergency legislation – measures adopted to tackle unprecedented circumstances – in Italy and the US, in order to identify commonalities and differences when informing the general public of the measures laid down particularly to protect workers in the workplace. This paper is intended to contribute to research in discourse analysis in OHS, an area of expertise which has been given fresh momentum since the onset of the pandemic. The decision to examine Italian and US emergency legislation was made in consideration of the cultural and legal differences between the two countries, which give rise to a number of discursive approaches to emergency management.

Publisher

Led Edizioni Universitarie

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Sociology and Political Science,Communication,Language and Linguistics,Cultural Studies

Reference23 articles.

1. Bhatia, Vijay K. 2010. "Legal Writing: Specificity - Specification in Legislative Writing: Accessibility, Transparency, Power and Control". In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, edited by Malcolm Coulthard and Alison Johnson, 37-50. Abingdon: Routledge.

2. Bhatia, Vijay K. 2017. Critical Genre Analysis: Investigating Interdiscursive Performance in Professional Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.

3. Calsamiglia, Helena, and Teun van Dijk. 2004. "Popularization Discourse and Knowledge about the Genome". Discourse and Society 15: 369-389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504043705

4. Crichton, Jonathan, and Fiona O'Neill. 2016. "Risk and Safety in Linguistic and Cultural Diversity: A Narrative Intervention in Residential Aged Care". In Communicating Risk, edited by Jonathan Crichton, Christopher N. Candlin, and Arthur S. Firkins, 51-66. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478788_4

5. Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Longman Pearson.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3