Abstract
This paper examines legal communication in Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) discourse and investigates the rhetorical strategies implemented at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. To this end, the paper focuses on a dataset of legal provisions introduced as emergency legislation – measures adopted to tackle unprecedented circumstances – in Italy and the US, in order to identify commonalities and differences when informing the general public of the measures laid down particularly to protect workers in the workplace. This paper is intended to contribute to research in discourse analysis in OHS, an area of expertise which has been given fresh momentum since the onset of the pandemic. The decision to examine Italian and US emergency legislation was made in consideration of the cultural and legal differences between the two countries, which give rise to a number of discursive approaches to emergency management.
Publisher
Led Edizioni Universitarie
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Sociology and Political Science,Communication,Language and Linguistics,Cultural Studies
Reference23 articles.
1. Bhatia, Vijay K. 2010. "Legal Writing: Specificity - Specification in Legislative Writing: Accessibility, Transparency, Power and Control". In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, edited by Malcolm Coulthard and Alison Johnson, 37-50. Abingdon: Routledge.
2. Bhatia, Vijay K. 2017. Critical Genre Analysis: Investigating Interdiscursive Performance in Professional Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
3. Calsamiglia, Helena, and Teun van Dijk. 2004. "Popularization Discourse and Knowledge about the Genome". Discourse and Society 15: 369-389.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504043705
4. Crichton, Jonathan, and Fiona O'Neill. 2016. "Risk and Safety in Linguistic and Cultural Diversity: A Narrative Intervention in Residential Aged Care". In Communicating Risk, edited by Jonathan Crichton, Christopher N. Candlin, and Arthur S. Firkins, 51-66. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478788_4
5. Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Longman Pearson.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献