Abstract
Simple, inexpensive and relatively durable, the board seems a natural part of class. Paradoxically, considering it as a teaching technique in its own right (Cuq &
Gruca, 2005) may seem surprising, but in reality, it is the most widespread technological medium in the classroom. Therefore, writing on the board is a practice
considered an integral part of the teaching profession in order to streamline the transmission of knowledge. Despite the fact that its presence is almost systematic in all classes, its use and management are little studied. Reorganizing, witnessing interactions and materializing the transition from oral to written, the functions of
the board are multiple, however, are teachers and learners aware of this? What representations do they have of the painting? Indeed, we attempted through a semi-directive interview, intended for 4th AMlearners, to show whether they consider the whiteboard as a didactic tool and, to identify their representations in relation to the role that this tool would play in their learning in class, more particularly during a session of reading comprehension of an argumentative text. Furthermore, the preliminary results showed on the one hand
the preponderant role played by the blackboard in the FFL class and on the other hand, that its management and organization are two factors which allowed optimal performance and a considerable contribution current teaching/learning techniques.
Reference14 articles.
1. "1. Aline, R., & Vandebrouck, F. (2003). Des utilisations du tableau par des professeurs de mathématiques en classe de seconde. Accessible sur : https://revue-rdm.com/2003/des-utilisations-du-tableau-par/
2. 2. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556 559. Accessible sur : https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359
3. 3. Cohen, N.J., & Squire, L.R. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of patternanalyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science, 210(4466), 207 210. Accessible sur : https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7414331
4. 4. Cuq, J.-P., & Gruca, I. (2005). Cours de didactique du français langue étrangère et seconde. Grenoble : PUG.
5. 5. Dehaene, S. (2013). Les quatre piliers de l'apprentissage, ou ce que nous disent les neurosciences. Paris Tech Review, 7. Accessible sur : http://www.paristechreview.com/2013/11/07/apprentissage-neurosciences