Author:
Khanal Sharad,Kumar Yadav Birendra,Subedi Aabishkar
Abstract
Background Sepsis is a major health burden with life- threatening conditions, which leads to a high rate of mortality in patients. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, which assesses organ dysfunction across multiple systems, has been considered a reliable indicator of the severity of critical illness. We have carried out this study to evaluate the predictive value of the SOFA score in assessing the mortality of patients with sepsis on admission. Methods Our study was a cross-sectional, descriptive study carried out in patients with sepsis who were admitted to the medical ICU of Chitwan Medical College from December 15, 2021, to December 14, 2022. Patient sampling was done based on a non-probability convenience sampling technique. Results In a study of 130 patients, 54.6% were male and 45.4% were female. The mean SOFA score was 7.1, with a median of 7. 38.5% (50 patients) died due to sepsis. The mean SOFA score was higher among deceased patients (9.3) than survivors (5.8). Higher SOFA scores were associated with increased mortality. 46% of patients required inotropes/Vasopressor support for shock. Patients requiring vasopressor support had a significantly higher mortality rate (53.3%) compared to those who did not need support (25.7%). 13.1% of patients required mechanical ventilatory support, and the majority of these patients (70.6%) had mortality. Conclusion SOFA score is a valuable tool to assess organ dysfunctions and it can predict the outcome of patients admitted with sepsis.
Publisher
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Reference73 articles.
1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour C, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). Vol. 315, JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. American Medical Association; 2016. p. 801–10.
2. Doi K, Estenssoro E, Ferrer R, Hodgson C, Møller MH, Jacob S, et al. Bin Du 28 Charles Gomersall 31 Mark Nunnally 47 Charles L. Sprung 57. Vol. 49. 2021. Available from: www.ccmjournal.org
3. Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NKJ, Hartog CS, Tsaganos T, Schlattmann P, et al. Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis current estimates and limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 1;193(3):259–72.
4. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200–11.
5. Torio CM, Moore BJ. National inpatient hospital costs: the most expensive conditions by payer, 2013: statistical brief 204. Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) statistical briefs. 2006;2006–16.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Future-Proofing Road Safety: Adapting ISO 26262 for Advanced V2X Integration;International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT);2024-09-07