Abstract
South Africa faces a lack of reliable, modern electricity, essential for economic and social development. Many communities in Gauteng, particularly rural, informal settlements, are not connected to the national grid, leaving 39 percent of the province's residents in darkness and relying on paraffin and gas to survive the cold winters. In addition, these two components increase the number of dead fires in unofficial regulation and the price of electricity camps, increasing the load on the poor. In this study, we surveyed existing literature on the affordable funding model of renewable energy sources, collected primary data in structured industry interviews and stakeholders. This research focused on this survey, focusing on domestic recurring models and analysing the appropriate financing model and financial exhibition source project funding, green finance, public, private partnership, Government subsidies and private investors also instruct foreign investors. Financial procurement model is mixed. In this study, we have developed a framework that allows representatives to link to the outlook of financiers and decision -making, using a mixed methodology approach, and allows you to allow reliable and useful research results. This gap represents a significant obstacle to renewable energy financing. Furthermore, the results indicate that innovative financing channels are needed to promote renewable energy development in Gauteng and South Africa, as traditional financing methods have had little effect in stimulating renewable energy development. Furthermore, the results show that green energy investors consider renewable energy sources to be very risky, even when supported by government policies. Therefore, the study proposes a financing model that brings together funders into small financial consortia to fund local renewable energy projects using a blended financing model. Such a model would spread risk across multiple investors, thereby reducing the potential risks of investments while achieving the goals and benefiting from tax credits and other incentives for investing in renewable energy.
Publisher
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Reference68 articles.
1. Abdul-Aziz, A. R., & Kassim, P. S. J. (2010). Objectives, success, and failure factors of housing public-private partnerships in Malaysia. Habitat International, 35(2011), 150-157.
2. Africa.com, (2023). Developing Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) For Africa’s Energy
3. Transition. https://www.africa.com/developing-public-private-partnerships-ppps-for-africas-energy-transition/.
4. AGRIMENT International (2016). Establishing slaughterhouse and meat processing plant in South Africa. Available at: www.agriment.com/en/news/establishing-slaughterhouse-and-meat-processing-plant-in-southafrica/ Accessed: 9 April 2020.
5. Akintoye, A., Beck, M., & Hardcastle, C. (Eds.). (2003). Public-private partnerships: Managing risks and opportunities. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Science.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A Study of the Impact of Magnesium Supplements on Asthma Control;International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT);2024-08-21