Abstract
This study examines how global and country- specific geopolitical instability affects Russian trade using data from 1996 to 2021. A panel regression model analyzes trade between Russia and its 15 top trading partners, exploring both direct and indirect effects. The analysis focuses on how accumulated foreign direct investment (FDI) and exchange rate fluctuations mediate these relationships. The findings reveal that global geopolitical instability decrease Russian trade by 0.0558. Interestingly, this negative impact is partially mediated by a decrease in FDI (-0.0805). This aligns with the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) results, which show a significant negative effect of global geopolitical instability on FDI (-1.209). This suggests that FDI acts as a key transmitter of the negative effects of global instability on Russian trade. The role of exchange rate fluctuations, however, is more complex. While the Sobel Test indicated a negative indirect effect, the SEM analysis shows a positive indirect effect through exchange rate fluctuations on trade. This suggests potentially countervailing effects of currency fluctuations, with depreciation potentially incentivizing exports while appreciation might make imports cheaper. The impact of country-specific geopolitical instability varies depending on the context. Industries like food products and textiles are significantly affected by geopolitical instability increase, while sectors such as fuels, metals and raw materials show resilience. Close trading partners are less affected by global instability but suffer from partner- specific instability. Geographically, Western Europe benefits from global instability but faces challenges from partner-specific instability, contrasting with Eastern Europe and Asia. Overall, this research contributes to the understanding of how geopolitical instability, mediated by FDI and exchange rates, shapes Russia's trade performance.
Publisher
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Reference30 articles.
1. Аrapova, E. Y., & Isachenko, T. M. (2019). Russian trade policy: main trends and impact on bilateral trade flows. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 26-48.
2. Aksenov, I. (2023). Trade and economic relations of the Russian Federation in modern conditions. International Scientific Siberian Transport Forum, 1-23.
3. Anderton, C., & Carter, J. (2019). Principles of Conflict Economics. the Political Economy of War, Terrorism, Genocide, and Peace.
4. Balcilar, M., Bonato, M., Demirer, R., & Gupta, R. (2018). Geopolitical risks and stock market dynamics of the BRICS. Economic Systems, 295-306.
5. Baldwin, R. E., & Wyplosz, C. (2014). Trade wars are all relative: Past trade conflicts in historical perspective. American Economic Review, 1006-1035.
Cited by
339 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Steel Structures in Context of Safety, Resilience & Sustainable Construction: Minimizing Environmental Impacts;International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT);2024-09-15
2. Pavan Gampala's Pattern: A Novel Observation in Arithmetic Sequences;International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT);2024-09-15
3. Assessment of Crude Oil Extract from Citrullus lanatus (Water Melon) for Pharmaceutical Application;International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT);2024-09-15
4. Quality of Life among Orphan Children in Bangladesh;International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT);2024-09-15
5. Drug Design and Drug Discovery;International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT);2024-09-13