Author:
Kgashane Lucas Pilusa Kgoshi
Abstract
Local government in the Republic of South Africa is crucial for providing services and fostering development at the grassroots level. However, the sector is plagued by high levels of corruption, undermining its effectiveness and eroding public trust. This paper examines the challenges of professionalizing local government in South Africa amidst pervasive corruption, exploring the current state of local governance, the impacts of corruption, and strategies for fostering professionalism to enhance service delivery and governance. Efforts to professionalize local government are essential for enhancing administrative efficiency, accountability, and transparency. This study employs a qualitative research design to investigate the barriers to professionalization and the measures that can be taken to overcome these challenges. Through interviews, case studies, and document analysis, the study seeks to provide insights into effective strategies for reducing corruption and improving the performance of local governments in South Africa. The findings suggest that while corruption remains a significant hurdle, targeted interventions such as capacity building, stringent oversight mechanisms, and community engagement can foster a culture of professionalism. The study concludes with recommendations for policymakers, practitioners, and stakeholders to support the professionalization of local government as a means to combat corruption and improve service delivery.
Publisher
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Reference63 articles.
1. Auditor-General of South Africa. (2020). Consolidated General Report on the Local Government Audit Outcomes 2018-19. Pretoria: Auditor-General of South Africa.
2. Bhorat, H., & Kanbur, R. (2006). Local government and poverty reduction in South Africa: Case studies from Cape Town and Johannesburg. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(4), 870-884.
3. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
5. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献