Professionalizing Local Government in the Republic of South Africa Amidst High Level of Corruption

Author:

Kgashane Lucas Pilusa Kgoshi

Abstract

Local government in the Republic of South Africa is crucial for providing services and fostering development at the grassroots level. However, the sector is plagued by high levels of corruption, undermining its effectiveness and eroding public trust. This paper examines the challenges of professionalizing local government in South Africa amidst pervasive corruption, exploring the current state of local governance, the impacts of corruption, and strategies for fostering professionalism to enhance service delivery and governance. Efforts to professionalize local government are essential for enhancing administrative efficiency, accountability, and transparency. This study employs a qualitative research design to investigate the barriers to professionalization and the measures that can be taken to overcome these challenges. Through interviews, case studies, and document analysis, the study seeks to provide insights into effective strategies for reducing corruption and improving the performance of local governments in South Africa. The findings suggest that while corruption remains a significant hurdle, targeted interventions such as capacity building, stringent oversight mechanisms, and community engagement can foster a culture of professionalism. The study concludes with recommendations for policymakers, practitioners, and stakeholders to support the professionalization of local government as a means to combat corruption and improve service delivery.

Publisher

International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

Reference63 articles.

1. Auditor-General of South Africa. (2020). Consolidated General Report on the Local Government Audit Outcomes 2018-19. Pretoria: Auditor-General of South Africa.

2. Bhorat, H., & Kanbur, R. (2006). Local government and poverty reduction in South Africa: Case studies from Cape Town and Johannesburg. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(4), 870-884.

3. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

5. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An Overview of Effectiveness of Balanced Scorecard Performance Management System in Tanzania;International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT);2024-08-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3