Rethinking Approaches to Negotiation Training in Russia and other Countries

Author:

Shevchuk N. V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-Western Institute of Management of RANEPA)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problems of negotiation training and research of modern negotiation practices in Russia and abroad in the context of expanding traditional diplomatic tools through the active involvement of non-state actors in world political processes, as well as the use of “expert diplomacy” resources in international negotiations.Aim . To identify current trends in the teaching of negotiations in Russia and the world, to show the features of modern negotiation practices in the context of new geopolitical realities.Tasks. To analyze the role of negotiations in modern social, political and international processes. To review the latest research in the field of negotiations in the context of Western and non-Western scientific schools on negotiations.Methods. The methods of empirical analysis, consistency, scientific discussion, informational and historical approaches are applied.Results . The key features of modern scientific schools on negotiations are revealed. The specificity of non-Western research on negotiations is shown. The importance of taking into account national, religious, and cultural peculiarities of business communication in building successful negotiation processes is evaluated.Conclusions . Along with the universalization of negotiation practice and the formation of a  unified negotiation  culture, there is a  pronounced trend towards combining negotiation skills based on classical strategies in the educational process, as well as mastering the knowledge and skills of intercultural communication, business etiquette and communication with representatives of various countries of the world.

Publisher

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Reference52 articles.

1. Baulina V. S. The Influ ence of National Traditions on the Style of Political Negotiations (on the Example of China, Japan and South Korea): dis. Institute of Philosophy RAS, 2009. (In Rus.)

2. Bogatyreva O. Humanitarian Diplomacy. Modern Concepts and Approaches // Internation al Processes [Mezhdunarodnye protsessy]. 2022. No. 20 (1). P. 166–191. (In Rus.) DOI: 10.17994/IT.2022.20.1.68

3. Borzova A. Yu., Medina Gonzales V. K. The Role of Mediation in Resolving Conflicts between Ecuador and Peru // Bulletin of the Russian Peoples’ Friendship University. Series: International relations [Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya]. 2023. V. 23. No. 2. P. 296–306. (In Rus.) DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-2-296-306

4. Gromyko A. A. Diplomat, Politician, Scientist. Moscow : ROSSPEN, 2000. (In Ru s.)

5. Zagorsky A. V., Lebed eva M. M. Theory and Methodology of Analysis of International Negotiations. Moscow, 1989. (In Rus.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3