Studies of expertise and experience as a way to overcome the crisis of expert knowledge: The problem of philosophical foundations

Author:

Kalinin Vladislav1

Affiliation:

1. MSSES

Abstract

The focus of the article is the project of British sociologists H. Collins and R. Evans on the Study of Expertise and Experience (SEE). The author of this article attempts to explicate the contexts of talking about expertise as a sociopolitical phenomenon. On the one hand, expertise is discussed in one line of research as an important component of socio-political processes. Expertise is defined in terms of power, its ability to influence decision-making processes in a legitimising way is increasing. On the other hand, the socio-ontological status of expertise is leveled due to the democratisation of access to information and the divergence of the modes of co-existence of science and politics, which is why, according to the researchers, expertise is in crisis. In these contexts, the author turns to the SEE project, which seeks to address the side effects of the proliferation of constructivist sociologies of knowledge and science. By questioning the ability of groups to access the truth and formulate expert judgements on its behalf, constructivist sociology removed the expert as a bearer of specified knowledge from the intellectual scene. Collins and Evans put expertise back on the research agenda; they propose a normative typology of expertise. The author of the article reconstructs the logic of constructing classifications of expertise and problematising two of its key types - interactional and contributory expertise. The article describes in detail the philosophical assumptions behind the concept of interactional expertise. The claims of this concept - as the author of the project sees it - to describe not only a common type of expertise, but also to become one of the conceptual resources for describing society are questionable, due to linguistic reductionism. Collins and Evans reproduce classic problems of sociological theory within the primary distinction of types of expertise.

Publisher

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Reference22 articles.

1. Ашкеров А. А. (2009) Экспертократия. Управление знаниями: производство и обращение информации в эпоху ультракапитализма. М.: Европа

2. Кнорр-Цетина К. (2006) Социальность и объекты. Социальные отношения в пост-социальных обществах знания. Социология вещей. М.: Территория будущего: 267306

3. Николс Т. (2019) Смерть экспертизы: как интернет убивает научные знания. М.: Бомбра

4. Решетников А. В., Айвазян Ш. Г., Присяжная Н. В. (2020) Роль участкового врача во мнениях молодых и опытных профессионалов. Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, 2: 331-346. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.2.764

5. Полани М. (1995) Личностное знание. На пути к посткритической философии / Под ред. В. А. Лекторского, В. А. Аршинова; пер. с англ. М. Б. Гнедовского, Н. М. Смирновой, Б. А. Старостина. М

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3