Whose Calculations? Which Rationalities?: Rationality of Governmentality and Irrationality of Risks in the Concept of Foucault

Author:

Belov Mikael1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. International Center for the Study of Institutions and Development, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Abstract

This article is dedicated to investigating rationality as one of the key characteristics of Michel Foucault's concept of governmentality and to related contradictions inside and outside Foucauldian theory. Using risk theory, the author explores the possibility of the existence of multiple rationalities in governmentalities and offers a solution to the contradiction within Foucauldian theory. The article focuses on the question of how it is possible to resolve both methodological, practical, as well as theoretical, contradictions in the theory of governmentality, keeping its main characteristics, such as population-centeredness, intact. The author concludes that diversification is more effective within the framework of multiple rationalities, which is most consistent with the understanding of the governmentality of the population as a goal, as a mechanism of risk management. The article makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the relationship between rationality and irrationality in the theory of governmentality, putting forward new ideas for the research and development of effective forms of public administration. The author also suggests ways to solve the paradox of regulated freedom, which has practical implications for modern methods of governance and regulation in society. This more detailed analysis clarifies how Foucault's concept of governmentality can be applied in a contemporary context, and how the limitations of rationality can be overcome to achieve more flexible and adaptive forms of governance

Publisher

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Reference16 articles.

1. Weber M. (2016) Economy and Society: Essays on Understanding Sociology, M.: Publishing house of the Higher School of Economics. — in Russ.

2. Ilyin M.V. (1997) Words and meanings. Experience in describing key political concepts, M.: “Russian Political Encyclopedia” (ROSSPEN). — in Russ

3. Mitchell D. (2016) Pravitel’nost’: vlast’ i pravlenie v sovremennykh obshchestvakh [Governmentality: power and rule in modern societies], M.: Publishing house “Delo” RANEPA. — in Russ

4. Orlov A.I., Pugach O.V. (2012) Approaches to general theory of risk. Management of large systems: collection of proceedings, 40: 49-82. — in Russ

5. Sklovsky K.I. (2019) Political and legal aspects of theory of gift. Political and legal aspects of theory of gift. Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia, 3: 55–86. https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2019-94-3-55-86. — in Russ

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3