Prolegomena to the Digital Legal History

Author:

Lonskaya S. V.1

Affiliation:

1. Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

Abstract

In the article, based on formal-logical, comparative, and historical-genetic methods of cognition, the author presents their own view on the foundations of an interdisciplinary scientific field — digital legal history: its scientific status, subject, sources, goals, tasks, and methodology. Digital legal history is a part as the history of law and the digital humanities. While remaining within the disciplinary subject of legal history (history of state and law), digital legal history methodologically intersects with informatics, studying historical legal sources using digital technologies and tools. At the core of the methodology of digital legal history lies the source-oriented paradigm (phenomenological concept of cognitive history and source studies method) and specialized digital research methods, which are combined with traditional principles, approaches, and techniques of legal historical research. The article also discusses the problems of sources in historical-legal research, the circle of which expands in digital legal history and includes any carriers of historical-legal information (data). The need to develop new competencies for researchers in the field of digital legal history, and the formation of a corresponding scientific and educational environment and infrastructure are highlighted. The conclusion is drawn that digital legal history, as an interdisciplinary scientific field, is transitioning from the stage of its genesis to institutionalization.

Publisher

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Reference27 articles.

1. Volodin, A. Yu., Orexov, B. V. (2023) Digital humanities: (self)definition, overview of directions. In: Digital Humanities Research. Siberian Federal University. Pp. 5–20 (in Russ.)

2. Garskova, I. M. (2019) “Digital turn” in Historical Research: Long-term Trends. Historical Informatics. No. 3, pp. 57–75. URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=31251 (accessed data: 19.04.2024) (in Russ.) DOI: 10.7256/2585-7797.2019.3.31251

3. Kant, I. (1965) Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics that May Emerge as a Science. In.: Essays in 6 volumes. Idea. Vol. 4, part 1, pp. 67–209 (in Russ.)

4. Kerimov, D. A. (2001) Methodology of Law (Subject, Functions, Problems of Philosophy of Law). 2nd ed. Moskow: Avanta+. 560 p. (in Russ.)

5. Kovkel, N. F. (2017). Semiotics of law: the problems of defining basic concepts and selecting the paradigm. Pravovedenie. No. 61 (4), pp. 38–59. URL: https://pravovedenie.spbu.ru/article/view/6784 (in Russ.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3