Modern Trends in Research Assessment: A Case of the Netherlands

Author:

Kochetkov D. M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ural Federal University; Leiden University

Abstract

After the departure of commercial scientific information databases such as Scopus and Web of Science from Russia, the problem of building a new system for research assessment is more relevant than ever. At the same time, the new system does not have to copy the previous one with other data sources. The purpose of the article is to analyze global trends in the field of research evaluation. The authors have examined key supranational documents and practices in introducing a responsible approach to research assessment in the Netherlands. All the reviewed sources agree on one point: research activities should not be assessed based solely on quantitative indicators, especially on the basis of surrogate measures of quality such as impact factor. In the Netherlands, all the key stakeholders in the research sphere adhere to responsible research evaluation. An important role is played by the concept of valorization, which involves the use of scientific research results in the economy and for the benefit of society as a whole. The experience of the Netherlands can be used in Russia to build an advanced system for assessing research activities, which will contribute to achieving the development goals of our country and the implementation of priorities in the scientific, technical, and socio-economic spheres.

Publisher

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Bill No. 285562–8 “On amendments to Paragraphs 14 and 15–1 of the Federal Law “On Science and State Scientific and Technical Policy” and Paragraphs 7 and 12 of the Federal Law “On the Russian Academy of Sciences, reorganization of state academies of sciences and amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation” (in terms of regulating relations in the sphere of scientific (scientific and technical) expert evaluation). URL: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/285562–8 (date accessed 08/13/2023).

2. Braun, T. (1999) Bibliometric indicators for the evaluation of universities – Intelligence from the quantitation of the scientific literature. Scientometrics 45, 425–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457602

3. Clarivate to Cease all Commercial Activity in Russia. 22.03.2022. Retrieved on August 13, 2023 from https://clarivate.com/news/clarivate-to-cease-all-commercial-activity-in-russia/.

4. CoARA. (2022). Agreement on reforming research assessment. 2022. Retrieved on July 7, 2023 from https://coara.eu/agreement/the-agreement-full-text/

5. Curry, S., Gadd, E & Wilsdon, J. (2022) Harnessing the Metric Tide: indicators, infrastructures & priorities for UK responsible research assessment. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21701624

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3