Affiliation:
1. ROSATOM State Atomic Energy Corporation
2. Russian Federal Nuclear Center – All-Russian Research Institute of Experimental Physics; The State University of Management
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of activating fundamental scientific activity in the Russian Federation by combining the efforts of various scientific institutes – institutions of the Academy of Sciences, universities, industry and corporate science within the framework of the National Center for Physics and Mathematics (NCPM). The purpose of the article is to identify institutional features and substantiate promising organizational tasks of the NCFM, the main research methods are institutional, normative, comparative analysis. Institutionally, the NCPM will make it possible to get away from the existing division of science along departmental lines and related problems. It is proved that the use of the organizational “CERN model” in the NCPM will be able to attract a wide range of scientists from various Russian and, in the future, foreign organizations, will help the formation of a collaboration for conducting experiments and research at scientific installations of the “megasience” class. This will make it possible to form and work out a national model of the mobility of scientists. The territorial and personnel aspects of the NCFM are considered, measures are proposed to expand the types of activities, to activate the influx of students and postgraduates for subsequent work in scientific and knowledge-intensive industrial organizations, to reflect the peculiarities of the development of the territory of the NCFM location in strategic documents of various levels. Conclusions are drawn about the positive impact of the activities of the NCPM on socio-economic processes; about new opportunities for diversification of the military-industrial complex associated with the development of fundamental science; about accelerating the formation of a system of technological transfer; contributing to the organization of the system of strategic planning and scientific and technical forecasting in the country
Publisher
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Reference16 articles.
1. Baydarov, D.Yu., Faykov, D.Yu. (2023). Developing mechanisms to ensure technological sovereignty of state corporations. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost, 6(4), 1335–1358. doi: 10.18334/ecsec.6.4.119296 (in Russ).
2. Egerev, S.V. (2020). Unique scientific installations as an object of state scientific and technical policy. Science Management: Theory and Practice, 2(4), 16–33. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2020.2.4.1 (in Russ).
3. Erokhina, E.A. (2020). Is There a Future for the Silicon Taiga? Prospects and Risks of the Project “Academgorodok 2.0”. Sociology of science and technology, 11(3), 106–118. doi: 10.24411/2079-0910-2020-13007 (in Russ).
4. Faikov, D.Yu., Baydarov, D.Yu. (2021). Cities of science: foreign and Russian experience for new Russian megaprojects. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 11(4), 1735–1754. doi: 10.18334/vinec.11.4.113905 (in Russ).
5. Faikov, D.Yu., Baydarov, D.Yu. (2022). Taking into account the peculiarities of closed nuclear cities in socio-economic development strategies of different levels. ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, and Practice, 4, 28–48. doi: 10.24412/2071-6435-2022-4-28-48 (in Russ).