Abstract
The increase in social inequality, which the author attributes to the spread of neoliberalism
around the world, complicates the system of power relations between men, their
bodies and sexualities. This leads to a differentiation of masculinities. Forty-three biographical
interviews are applied to a critical rethinking of the configuration of power
relations among male blue-collar and white-collar workers. The author concludes that
work guides emotional relationships and consequently regulates the sexual life of men
from both social environments. In addition, the regimes of industrial and office work
generate different logical manipulations of male corporeality, which are carried over
into the private sphere and employed in structuring masculine subjectivity.
Physical skills and strength are the main factors on which blue-collar manual
workers base their masculinity, while bodily representations and performance serve
in that capacity for white-collar workers. This social differentiation in the structure
of work results in uneven chances for creating a “successful” masculine subject.
Male blue-collar workers call themselves “losers”, while white-collar workers perceive
themselves as “successful” even though men from both environments are exploited.
The physical labour of a blue-collar worker is alienated by the process of corporeal
management on the job, while the body of a white-collar office worker is commoditized
and becomes a sign in the system of symbolic exchange. At the same time,
the research shows that the boundaries between social environments are becoming
blurred and class consciousness is weakening. This allows both blue-collar workers
and white-collar workers to follow similar sexual strategies which differ only in form
and style. The masculine subjectivities of blue-collar and white-collar workers include
the very same structural components derived from the traditional, liberal and new
versions of masculinity, which are distinct in the means and forms of their expression.
Publisher
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Philosophy,Cultural Studies
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献