The New Wars: On the Return of a Historical Model

Author:

Abstract

The article is devoted to the development of the theory of “new wars.” The author maintains that the system for regulating war developed after the Peace of Westphalia (1648) has ceased to function under current conditions. The structural changes introduced in the new wars are: 1) re-commercialization of military violence, which once again turns war into an instrument for advancing certain (not necessarily political) interests; 2) merging military and criminal violence as warlords and their entourages make their living by profiting from war and forge alliances with international crime; 3) using strategic asymmetries in which the party with inferior power does not try to capture territory and win recognition by the state, but instead uses the expansion of the war (in space and time) to obtain advantages. The author analyses the Westphalian conception of sovereignty in which war and peace are understood as equally valid states for political aggregates. The transition from one to the another comes through an exercise of the will of the sovereign, whose right to wage war (jus ad bellum) is not limited to external campaigns (as the power of the Emperor or the Pope was in the Middle Ages). However, as war became accepted as a state monopoly, there was a codification of the rules of conducting it (jus in bello) that resulted in the adoption of the Geneva and Hague Conventions. The author also analyses the Thirty Years’ War as a typological model which differs from the Westphalian type by not being governed by a unitary regulatory system. The extraordinary duration and brutality of this type of conflict comes from blurring the boundaries between war and peace and between inter-state and civil war. The characteristic features of this non-Westphalian historical model are found in some modern wars, especially in the Middle East. The author develops this analogy and recommends using historical experience in order to prevent the conflicts in the Middle East in from merging into a single devastating war.

Publisher

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Subject

Literature and Literary Theory,Philosophy,Cultural Studies

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. History is written by the undefeated, or once again about the partisan;Filozofija i drustvo;2022

2. Influence of the Yalta Conference on the Development of Modern International Law;Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки;2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3