Abstract
As anthropologists increasingly embark upon the study of the international sphere, this often builds on different forms of engagement within and around organizations, processes, and institutional corridors. The co-authors, building upon a round table exchange, address the advantages and dilemmas of anthropological engagement in the field of international governance, including humanitarian work, diplomacy, international organizations, the Swiss federal government, NGOs, and multinationals.
Reference59 articles.
1. Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal. 2000. “Hard Law and Soft Law in International Governance.” International Organization 54, no.3: 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280
2. Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1992. “Writing Against Culture.” In Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present, edited by Richard Gabriel Fox, 137–162. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
3. Alonso Bejarano, Carolina, Lucia López Juárez, Mirian A. Mijangos García, and Daniel M. Goldstein. 2019. Decolonizing Ethnography: Undocumented Immigrants and New Directions in Social Science. Durham: Duke University Press.
4. André, Guy and Maaike Bleeker. 1993, Approches de la prévention du sida en milieu nocturne, Morges: Association du Relais.
5. Armbruster, Heidi. 2008. “Introduction: The Ethics of Taking Sides.” In Taking Sides: Ethics, Politics, and Fieldwork in Anthropology, edited by Heidi Armbruster and Anna Lærke, 1–22. New York: Berghahn Books.