Mexico and China in the US manufacturing market: An empirical analysis

Author:

Cuevas Ahumada Víctor M.,Calderón Villarreal Cuauhtémoc

Abstract

<p>This paper conducts a disaggregated comparative analysis of China’s and Mexico’s export dynamism in the US manufacturing market over the period 1994-2015 and, against this backdrop, it estimates a panel data econometric model showing the impact of key variables on Mexico’s export performance across manufacturing subsectors of different technology categories. Export performance is measured in terms of import market shares in the US and numerous econometric issues are addressed to produce a plausible model. In addition to capturing some heterogeneity among different manufacturing subsectors, this study shows that: (i) a depreciation of the real exchange rate calculated for each subsector worsens (rather than improves) Mexico’s export performance, which is likely due not only to the high import content of Mexican manufacturing exports, but also to the increasing weight of the private sector’s external liabilities; (ii) a fall in domestic unit labor costs has a positive impact on Mexico’s export performance, which highlights the importance of raising labor productivity faster than wages; and (iii) a reduction in US unit labor costs deteriorates Mexico’s export performance. In this context, the empirical evidence leads to clear-cut policy recommendations to raise export performance and thus economic growth.</p>

Publisher

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference36 articles.

1. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some test of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

2. Aysan, A. F., y Y. S. Hacihasanoglu (2007). Investigation on the determinants of Turkish export-boom in 2000s, MPRA Paper No. 5493, Munich Personal RePEc Archive Papers, Munich, BAV. Available at: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/5493/ Accessed: 20/06/2019.

3. Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester, WS: John Wiley & Sons.

4. Bayoumi, T., y B. Eichengreen (1997). Is Regionalism Simply a Diversion? Evidence from the EC and EFTA. In T. Ito y A. O. Krueger (Eds.), Regionalism versus multilateral trade arrangements (pp. 141-168). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Available at: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c8599.pdf Accessed: 20/06/2019.

5. Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-Series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634-647. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082979

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3