Abstract
Studied worldwide, well-being is an important principle for the modern societies and needs to reflect the local cultures of the targeted populations. Semantic networks and graph theory address this issue: a definition of well-being comes directly from a sample of the targeted population. The stage one (N = 201, 52% female and 48% male, volunteers—informed consent provided—, 20 years and older, mean = 39.97 years, S.D. = 13.56 years) semantic networks defined well-being. In stage two the networks were the foundation to construct two scales which were validated (sample N = 427, 55% female and 45% male, volunteers—informed consent provided— 20 years and older, mean = 37.75 years, S.D. = 12.54 years). Analyzed with graph theory, well-being resulted in a social complex system (non-linearity, small world phenomenon, emergency), and showed the main elements to define well-being (affect and cognitive components). Its subgraphs were arranged into three main domains with subdomains: health (physical and psychological), relationships (family, friends, community) and resources (personal, material, time). The scale of satisfaction with well-being (α = .912) and the scale of experiences of well-being (α = .969) showed a good fit and obtained adequate values. Semantic networks proved to be a good resource to help in the construction of a questionnaire to study well-being with a cultural perspective.
Publisher
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Reference75 articles.
1. Ahn, Namkee, Juan Ramón García, and Juan Francisco Jimeno. 2009. The impact of unemployment on individual well-being in the EU. 23 pp. http://www.ENEPRI.org. ISBN 92-9079-509-3.
2. Albert, Reka, and Albert-László Barabási. 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74: 47-97. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47.
3. Archer, Jo. A., Z. M. Tony Lim, Hui Chian Teh, Weining C. Chang, and S. H. Annabel Chen. 2015. The effect of age on the relationship between stress, well-being, and health in a Singaporean sample. Ageing International, 40: 413-425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-015-9225-3.
4. Asociación Mexicana de Agencias de Inteligencia de Mercado y Opinión. 2013. Índice de niveles socioeconómicos. https://www.amai.org/NSE/.
5. Ballas, Dimitris, and Mark Tranmer. 2012. Happy places? A multilevel modeling approach to the analysis of happiness and well-being. International Regional Science Review, 35: 70-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017611403737.