Expert Evaluation on the Content Validity of the Novice Teachers’ Assessment Inventory (InPGN)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Expert Evaluation on the Content Validity of the Novice Teachers’ Assessment Inventory (InPGN)

Published:2023-09-19 Issue:SI15 Volume:8 Page:107-112
ISSN:2398-4287
Container-title:Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal
language:
Short-container-title:E-BPJ

Author:

Musikin Muslihaza,Mohd Matore Mohd Effendi a.k.a. Ewan,Mohamad Norazlinda

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the validity of the Novice Teachers' Assessment Inventory (InPGN) utilizing expert consensus perspectives and the Content Validity Index (CVI). A total of 97 items involved nine experts from assessment literacy, psychometrics, and language field by using purposive sampling. Validity tests found that InPGN has a CVI value of 0.98, indicating a very high level of instrument suitability. An implication of this remains expected to provide an excellent measurement tool in helping novice teachers improve their professional development in a more authentic assessment dimension.

Publisher

e-IPH Ltd.

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Water Science and Technology,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference20 articles.

1. Abu Mansor, N. (2017). Pengukuran pengetahuan, amalan dan integriti pentaksiran bilik darjah dalam kalangan guru Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi. [Master’s thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia]. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

2. Almanasreh, E., Moles, R. & Chen, T.F. (2019). Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(2): 214–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066.

3. Curriculum Development Division (BPK)(2018). Panduan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (1st ed.). Curriculum Development Division. http://jpnperak.moe.gov.my/ppdbagandatuk/attachments/article/3555/Panduan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah 2018.pdf.

4. Creswell, J.W. (2014) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.

5. Davis, L.L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4): 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4