A new technology of evidence research is necessary in criminal proceedings

Author:

Myroshnychenko Yuriy1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Illichiv district court of Mariupol

Abstract

The purpose of the research, part of the results of which is presented in this article, was an attempt to formulate and describe the method of judicial evidence, the method of disclosing before the court the content and significance of the evidence collected by the parties, to develop and propose rules for conducting individual legal actions, to link them into a single process (technology) forensic research. The procedure for examining evidence is not only the sequence of relevant actions, but also court-approved regulations for working with separate evidence, according to which the parties, when providing documentary evidence, must not only name the documents that they use to support their positions, but also disclose their content and report on the circumstances. in support of which they are submitted, so that it is clear both to the court and to any outside, reasonable and impartial observer. When presenting evidence, the prosecutor and the lawyer must demonstrate to the court both the propriety and admissibility of individual sources of factual data, as well as the logical connections between them, proving certain circumstances, criticizing the evidence of the procedural opponent, emphasizing the shortcomings of others and the advantages of their own evidence. That is, the content of the evidence must be revealed at the court hearing by the party that submits it to the judicial investigation, and not by the court, which should be exempted from the obligation to declare the documents provided by the parties. At the same time, the submission of evidence is not limited to providing the court with written, electronic documents or physical evidence. The justification by the parties of the necessity of questioning witnesses, experts, ensuring the arrival of these persons to the court and their questioning before the court is also the submission of evidence – factual data, information about which the interrogated have. It is proposed to borrow the experience of the courts of common law countries, where material evidence is usually submitted through witnesses who can testify to its origin. Key words: Criminal proceedings, evidencing, technology of court research.

Publisher

The National School of Judges of Ukraine

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference15 articles.

1. Patenaude, P. (1997). De l'expertise judiciaire dans le cadre du procès criminel et de la recherche de la vérité: Quelques Réfl exions. Revue De Droit. Université De Sherbrooke, 27(1), 1–47. URL: https://doi.org/10.17118/11143/12850

2. Belkin, A. R. (1999). Teoriya dokazyvaniya [Еvidence theory]. Moskva: Izdatelstvo NORMA [russ.].

3. Krushynskyi, S. A. (2017). Podannia dokaziv u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy [Submission of evidence in criminal proceedings of Ukraine]. Khmelnytskyi: Khmelnytskyi universytet upravlinnia ta prava [ukr.].

4. Belonosov, V. O. (2010). Problemy tolkovaniya norm ugolovno-processualnogo prava [Problems of interpretation of the norms of criminal procedure law]. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2, 22-24 [russ.].

5. Isaenko, V. N. (2018). Taktiko-psihologicheskie aspekty predstavleniya prokurorom dokazatelstv v sude s uchastiem prisyazhnyh zasedatelej [Tactical and psychological aspects of the presentation of evidence by the prosecutor in court with the participation of jurors]. Kriminalist, 2(23), 18-23 [russ.].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3