The Population Genetics of X–Autosome Synthetic Lethals and Steriles

Author:

Lachance Joseph12,Johnson Norman A3,True John R1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5222

2. Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6145

3. Department of Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences and Graduate Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003

Abstract

Abstract Epistatic interactions are widespread, and many of these interactions involve combinations of alleles at different loci that are deleterious when present in the same individual. The average genetic environment of sex-linked genes differs from that of autosomal genes, suggesting that the population genetics of interacting X-linked and autosomal alleles may be complex. Using both analytical theory and computer simulations, we analyzed the evolutionary trajectories and mutation–selection balance conditions for X–autosome synthetic lethals and steriles. Allele frequencies follow a set of fundamental trajectories, and incompatible alleles are able to segregate at much higher frequencies than single-locus expectations. Equilibria exist, and they can involve fixation of either autosomal or X-linked alleles. The exact equilibrium depends on whether synthetic alleles are dominant or recessive and whether fitness effects are seen in males, females, or both sexes. When single-locus fitness effects and synthetic incompatibilities are both present, population dynamics depend on the dominance of alleles and historical contingency (i.e., whether X-linked or autosomal mutations occur first). Recessive synthetic lethality can result in high-frequency X-linked alleles, and dominant synthetic lethality can result in high-frequency autosomal alleles. Many X–autosome incompatibilities in natural populations may be cryptic, appearing to be single-locus effects because one locus is fixed. We also discuss the implications of these findings with respect to standing genetic variation and the origins of Haldane’s rule.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics

Reference66 articles.

1. Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions;Agresti;Am. Stat.,1998

2. A two-locus mutation-selection model and some of its evolutionary implications;Bengtsson;Theor. Popul. Biol.,1983

3. The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes;Charlesworth;Am. Nat.,1987

4. Selection-mutation balance for two nonallelic recessives producing an inferior double homozygote;Christiansen;Am. J. Hum. Genet.,1977

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3