Mutational Pleiotropy and the Strength of Stabilizing Selection Within and Between Functional Modules of Gene Expression

Abstract

Abstract Collet et al. adopt a high-dimensional quantitative genetic approach using gene expression traits to test for the presence of modularity of the genotype-phenotype map, where traits contributing to the same function (functional modularity)... Variational modules, sets of pleiotropically covarying traits, affect phenotypic evolution, and therefore are predicted to reflect functional modules, such that traits within a variational module also share a common function. Such an alignment of function and pleiotropy is expected to facilitate adaptation by reducing the deleterious effects of mutations, and by allowing coordinated evolution of functionally related sets of traits. Here, we adopt a high-dimensional quantitative genetic approach using a large number of gene expression traits in Drosophila serrata to test whether functional grouping, defined by gene ontology (GO terms), predicts variational modules. Mutational or standing genetic covariance was significantly greater than among randomly grouped sets of genes for 38% of our functional groups, indicating that GO terms can predict variational modularity to some extent. We estimated stabilizing selection acting on mutational covariance to test the prediction that functional pleiotropy would result in reduced deleterious effects of mutations within functional modules. Stabilizing selection within functional modules was weaker than that acting on randomly grouped sets of genes in only 23% of functional groups, indicating that functional alignment can reduce deleterious effects of pleiotropic mutation but typically does not. Our analyses also revealed the presence of variational modules that spanned multiple functions.