Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Composition Traits Within an Applied Soybean Breeding Program

Author:

Stewart-Brown Benjamin B1,Song Qijian2,Vaughn Justin N3,Li Zenglu1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Genomics and Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602

2. Soybean Genomics and Improvement Lab, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705

3. Genomics and Bioinformatics Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Center for Applied Genetic Technologies, Athens, GA 30602

Abstract

Abstract Genomic selection (GS) has become viable for selection of quantitative traits for which marker-assisted selection has often proven less effective. The potential of GS for soybean was characterized using 483 elite breeding lines, genotyped with BARCSoySNP6K iSelect BeadChips. Cross validation was performed using RR-BLUP and predictive abilities (rMP) of 0.81, 0.71, and 0.26 for protein, oil, and yield, were achieved at the largest tested training set size. Minimal differences were observed when comparing different marker densities and there appeared to be inflation in rMP due to population structure. For comparison purposes, two additional methods to predict breeding values for lines of four bi-parental populations within the GS dataset were tested. The first method predicted within each bi-parental population (WP method) and utilized a training set of full-sibs of the validation set. The second method utilized a training set of all remaining breeding lines except for full-sibs of the validation set to predict across populations (AP method). The AP method is more practical as the WP method would likely delay the breeding cycle and leverage smaller training sets. Averaging across populations for protein and oil content, rMP for the AP method (0.55, 0.30) approached rMP for the WP method (0.60, 0.52). Though comparable, rMP for yield was low for both AP and WP methods (0.12, 0.13). Based on increases in rMP as training sets increased and the effectiveness of WP vs. AP method, the AP method could potentially improve with larger training sets and increased relatedness between training and validation sets.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Genetics,Molecular Biology

Reference57 articles.

1. Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.;Albrecht;Theor. Appl. Genet.,2011

2. American Soybean Association, 2018 2016 Soy Highlights. The American Soybean Association. http://soystats.com/ 2013-highlights/ (accessed 20 Jan. 2018).

3. Prospects for genome-wide selection for quantitative traits in maize.;Bernardo;Crop Sci.,2007

4. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps.;Barrett;Bioinformatics,2005

5. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.;Bates;J. Stat. Softw.,2015

Cited by 70 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3