Abstract
BACKGROUND A deep overbite may be due to an underlying skeletal or dentoalveolar component that may influence the treatment plan. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the different components of deep bite malocclusion and normal occlusion. METHODS This was a case control study. Lateral cephalograms and study casts of normal (N = 50) and deep overbite (N = 50) subjects were used to evaluate skeletal and dentoalveolar components. Data was analysed statistically by independent t - test. RESULTS The significant skeletal contributing factors were gonial angles, mandibular plane, maxillary plane angle & ramus / Frankfort horizontal. An increased curve of Spee and decreased mandibular first molar height were predominant dental variables in the deep overbite group. The inclination of the upper incisors & lower incisors height did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The counterclockwise rotation of the mandible and the increased curve of Spee were the dominant features of deep bite malocclusion. This analysis of deep overbite components could help clinicians design individualised mechanotherapy based on the underlying cause rather than being prejudiced toward conventional mechanics when correcting with a deep overbite malocclusion. KEY WORDS Skeletal and Dental Components, Deep Overbite, Ramus / Frankfort Horizontal
Publisher
Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
Reference16 articles.
1. [1] McNamara JA Jr. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981;51(3):177-02.
2. [2] Craig CE. The skeletal patterns characteristic of class I and class II, division 1 malocclusions in normalateralis. Angle Orthod 1951;21(4):44-56.
3. A cephalometric description of class II division 1 malocclusion;Hitchcock;Am J Orthod,1973
4. [4] Pancherz H, Zieber K, Hoyer B. Cephalometric characteristics of class II division 1 and class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children. Angle Orthod 1997;67(2):111-20.
5. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions;Isik;Eur J Orthod,2006