Author:
Hasanain Fatin Abdulrahman
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical and dental education is highly dependent on the development of students’ clinical skills in addition to their theoretical knowledge. The use of logbooks to monitor the clinical procedures performed by students provides a great advantage in the educational process. Because of the pandemic, utilisation of digital logbooks may prove to be more advantageous. This study aims to investigate the effective use of online progress records and as to whether they actually decrease the chance of error compared to the traditional paper-based logbooks. METHODS In this quasi-experimental study, 139 student logbooks were studied to compare online and paper-based clinical procedures. Logbook monitoring of undergraduate dental students reported by the students themselves vs. instructors was compared. Students filled mandatory individual paper-based logbooks, reporting the number of clinical procedures performed in that year. Additionally, they filled online log- sheets, and updated them regularly. Instructors proofread and signed the paper-based students’ logbooks. Instructors also separately submitted individual online forms recording each student’s clinical procedure performed in clinical sessions. A total of 556 logbook records was collected. The mean number of procedures recorded by the students and instructors (online and paper-based) were statistically compared. RESULTS The mean number of procedures recorded in student-reported online logbooks were significantly lower than that in all other logbooks. Paper-based and online instructorreported logbook data was identical to that of student reported paper-based logbooks. CONCLUSIONS Within the scope of the study, it was concluded that online tools are an asset and may be used as a substitute for paper-based monitoring of clinical activity for instructors. However, students’ compliance updating and uploading online forms is a factor, which is a matter of concern. KEY WORDS Undergraduate Dental Logbooks, Clinical Progress Records, Monitoring Methods, Monitoring Tools, Undergraduate Dental Monitoring, Undergraduate Clinical Procedures Records
Publisher
Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
Reference20 articles.
1. The national portfolio for postgraduate family medicine training in South Africa: a descriptive study of acceptability, educational impact and usefulness for assessment;Jenkins;BMC Med Educ,2013
2. [2] Gadbury-Amyot CC, Bray KK, Austin KJ. Fifteen years of portfolio assessment of dental hygiene student competency: lessons learned. J Dent Hyg 2014;88(5):267-74.
3. A blueprint for implementation of a structured portfolio in an internal medicine residency;AA;Acad Med,2012
4. [4] Fida NM, Hassanien M, Shamim MS, et al. Students perception of portfolio as a learning tool at King Abdulaziz University Medical School. Med Teach 2018;40(Suppl 1):S104-13.
5. Portfolio: an innovative teaching, learning and assessment tool in medical training;Marambe;Sri Lanka Journal of Medicine,2015
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献