Author:
Akula Nyna Sindhu,Krishna Navaneeth,Sathu Sreedhar
Abstract
BACKGROUND Wounds and their management are important in the practice of surgery. Super oxidised solution is a recent concept in wound management. It is an aqueous solution which is electrochemically processed which is non-toxic, non-irrigating and is having a neutral pH. Povidone iodine is the most common topical wound care product used in surgical practice. Both are affordable solutions for the patients. There are very few studies comparing the efficacy. In this study, we wanted to compare the efficacy of super oxidised solution and povidone iodine in the management of lower limb ulcers. METHODS A prospective study was conducted on 100 patients who were randomized into two groups. Group A was treated with super oxidized solution and Group B were treated with povidone iodine. Assessments of wounds were done on various days (1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21). Various outcomes of data were analysed using statistical analysis. RESULTS The average percentage reduction in wound size on day 21 was 47 % in Group A compared to 24 % in Group B. Early appearance of granulation tissue, disinfection, decrease in wound size, and less duration of hospital stay was achieved in Group A. CONCLUSIONS The results were more favourable towards super oxidised solution than povidone iodine. In this comparative study, super oxidized solution had faster efficacy and wound healing in patients than povidone iodine. KEY WORDS Super Oxidized Solution, Ulcer, Povidone Iodine.
Publisher
Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
Reference16 articles.
1. Epidemiology, etiology and treatment of chronic leg ulcer: experience with sixty patients;Rahman;Annals of African Medicine,2010
2. [2] Reiber GE, Boyko E, Smith DG. Lower extremity ulcers and amputations in individuals with diabetes. In: Harris MI, Cowie CC, Stern MP, et al. eds. Diabetes in America. 2nd edn. Washington, DC, U.S.: Govt. Printing Office 1995: p. 409-27.
3. [3] Hilton JR, Williams DT, Beuker B, et al. Wound dressings in diabetic foot disease. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39(Suppl 2):S100-3.
4. [4] Edmonds M, Foster A. The use of antibiotics in the diabetic foot. Am J Surg 2004;187(5A):25S-8S.
5. Systematic review of antimicrobial agents used for chronic wounds;O'Meara;Br J Surg,2001