Author:
Unal Samican,Akbiyik Sema Yazici,Bakir Elif Pinar,Bakir Seyhmus
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cavity disinfectants are frequently used for the elimination of bacteria that remain in the cavity, which are shown as the cause of secondary caries. However, its effect on microleakage from the tooth-restoration interface is still under investigation. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the effects of the use of three different cavity disinfectants on microleakage in Class V composite restorations. METHODS For this study, 28 permanent third molar teeth without caries and restoration were used. Class V cavities of 4 mm x 3 mm x 3 mm were prepared on the buccal surfaces of each tooth. The teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups, with 7 teeth in each group. No cavity disinfectant was applied to the teeth in group 1. Tubulicid Red Label (Dental Therapeutics AB, Sweden) cavity disinfectant was applied to the 2nd group teeth, Cavity Cleanser (BISCO Inc., USA) cavity disinfectant to the 3rd group teeth, and Oxygenated Water (Dermosept, Turkey) cavity disinfectant to the 4th group teeth. Composite resin with universal adhesive and nanohybrid filler was applied to all samples in the groups in accordance with the recommendations of the manufacturers, and finishing and polishing processes were performed. Then, the thermal cycle (NOVA, Konya, Turkey) procedure was applied. After the restorations were covered with nail polish, they were kept in a 5 % basic fuchsin solution. The teeth were cut vertically in the buccolingual direction and examined with a stereomicroscope at x 40 magnification. The results were statistically evaluated with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS When the microleakage scores were compared between the control group and the groups treated with Tubulicid Red Label (p:0.204), Cavity Cleanser (p:0.204) and Oxygenated Water (P: 0.788), it was determined that there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). CONCLUSİONS It was determined that different cavity disinfectants applied in Class V cavities did not have a negative effect on microleakage and the closest results to the control group were seen in the group where cavity cleanser disinfectant containing 2 % chlorhexidine digluconate was applied. KEY WORDS Cavity Disinfectants, Class V Cavity, Microleakage.
Publisher
Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
Reference38 articles.
1. Resin composite--state of the art;Ferracane;Dent Mater,2011
2. [2] Darabi F, Eftekhari M. Effect of chlorhexidine on microleakage of composite restorations. Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2009;6(1):16-22.
3. [3] Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Ritter AV. Introduction to composite restorations. 'Sturdevant's, The art and science of operative dentistry' (Ed. T.M. Robenson, H.O. Heymann, E.J. Swift), IV. Bask, Mosby Inc.,Missouri 2002:473-99.
4. Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress;JR;J Am Dent Assoc,2000
5. [5] Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, et al. The effect of flexural load cycling on microleakage of cervical resin composites. Oper Dent 2001;26(5):451-9.