Author:
Jebaraj Sam,R Subhasree,N. Thiyaneswaran,Rani Dimple
Abstract
BACKGROUND The factors that influence the implant accuracy are the anatomy of the patient, the experience of the practitioner and the surgical approach. However, the relative importance of each factor is poorly understood. Favourable function, occlusion, aesthetics and implant loading patterns can be obtained by optimal positioning. The experience of the surgeon is of utmost importance for the skill of placing a dental implant with proper angulation. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the increased accuracy obtained in performing freehand surgical placement of implants. METHODS This study was conducted in the Department of Implantology. A total of 1216 postoperative periapical radiographs from which single implant placement with adjacent straight root morphology was collected from the department in the period of June 2019 to June 2020 and checked for angulation, practitioner’s experience and the site of placement. Mesio-distal angulation was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS method. RESULTS The results showed accuracy in angulation and positioning of implants increased with an increase in experience of the dental surgeon (oral surgeons, prosthodontists, periodontists). Within the limitations of the study, it showed that the freehand dental implant placement angulation was less than a degree for experienced surgeons. The postgraduates had a better understanding and orientation of the angulation than the undergraduates. Moreover, the difficult site was the second and third quadrant to assess the angulation properly. CONCLUSIONS With proper assessment of the anatomy and with experience freehand dental implant placement shows significant results with less angulation which can be prosthetically accepted. KEY WORDS Free Hand Surgery, Guided Surgery, Angulation Of Implants.
Publisher
Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
Reference16 articles.
1. [1] De Angelis F, Papi P, Mencio F, et al. Implant survival and success rates in patients with risk factors: results from a long-term retrospective study with a 10 to 18 years follow-up. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2017;21(3):433-7.
2. [2] Derks J, Tomasi C, Wennström Jl, et al. Response to letter to the editor. Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: early and late implant loss. Journal of Dental Research 2015;94(Suppl 3):44S-51S.
3. 10-Year survival rate and the incidence of peri-implant disease of 374 titanium dental implants with a sla surface: a prospective cohort study in 177 fully and partially edentulous patients;Velzen Fjj;Clin Oral Implants Res,2015
4. [4] Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, et al. Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2012;23(Suppl 6):112-23.
5. Prosthodontic complications related to non-optimal dental implant placement;Cooper;Dental Implant Complications,2015
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献