Author:
Masurkar Deepika,Jaiswal Priyanka,Agrawal Diksha
Abstract
Resorbed alveolar ridges, which can be horizontal or vertical in size, are one of the most prevalent issues addressed by dental experts. One of the therapy options for addressing the weak sections of the alveolar ridges is alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis is a biological process that includes gradual traction between vascularized bone segments in order to generate new bone. Typically, an osteotomy is done, followed by the placement of an osteodistraction device to manage the separating process. This approach eliminates the need for bone grafts by producing the same quality and shape of bone. Distraction osteogenesis (DO) causes soft tissue to develop as new bone is formed on the deficient ridge. Because this treatment restores bone height, lengthier dental implants can be placed. In this work, we cover ride augmentation and the numerous procedures used to repair a resorbed alveolar ridge. It emphasises the relevance of alveolar distraction osteogenesis and provides a brief history of the procedure based on existing information. To summarise, distraction osteogenesis proved efficient in increasing the alveolar ridge and ensuring dental implant recovery. KEY WORDS Distraction osteogenesis, stages of distraction osteogenesis, advantages and disadvantages of distraction osteogenesis.
Publisher
Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
Reference26 articles.
1. A 15 - year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw;Adell;Int J Oral Surg,1981
2. Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single - tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a systematic review to survival, bone level, soft - tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction;Den Hartog;J Clin Periodontol,2008
3. Tentpole technique for bone regeneration in vertically deficient alveolar ridges: a review;Daga;J Oral Biol Craniofac Res,2015
4. Decision tree for vertical ridge augmentation;Plonka;Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,2018
5. [5] Cope JB, Samchukov ML, Cherkashin AM, et al. Biomechanics of mandibular distractor orientation: an animal model analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57(8):952-62; discussion 963-4.